UGC NET Law Previous Question Paper Mock Test Jun 2013

Authentic Feedback from previous LawMint users :

I got AIR 21 in CLAT PG. Thank you so much. Your mocks helped me a lot in my preparation 🙂 - Ayushi Jain

I have subscribed to your CLAT PG program and got AIR 36 in this year CLAT PG. I have also secured AIR 54 in AILET PG exam. I would like to thank you. Your mock paper really helps a lot - Shrashank Tripathi

I would like to thank you for the CLAT PG LLM COURSE. Practising mock tests there helped me in getting confidence and hence I was able to get AIR 45 in CLAT PG LLM - Akshay Awasthi

A year back, I relied on the IIT Kharagpur RGSOIPL mock test series by LawMint to prepare for my RGSOIPL entrance test. Few months back, I relied on your UGC NET Law series to prepare for UGC NET. I was the topper of the RGSOIPL entrance, and have cracked JRF in UGC NET. All thanks to LawMint - Anshuman Sahoo

"I got AIR 18 in CLAT PG and General Category rank 28 in AILET PG. I want to thank you for helping me practice well in controlled conditions from any place. It gave me a lot of confidence and I took the tests while travelling too. I also made it to IIT Kharagpur." - Vinodharani

"Lawmint has been of great help to me in securing AIR 25 in AILET PG and AIR 29 in CLAT PG examinations. The subjective and objective approach of the test series kept me up to date with the latest exam pattern." - Bhawna Nanda

"I, Nimmy Saira Zachariah joined you clat test series. I cleared AILET PG with 30th rank. Your test series were of immense help as it gave me clear idea of where my preparations stand thank you once again law mint." - Nimmy S Z

"Hey guys. Where do I start? If I thought that getting AIR 59 in Clat PG was it, then how wrong I was. With Lawmint now I have cracked UGC NET as well." - Joyanta Chakraborty

---

Q. Read Assertion I and Reason II and with the help of codes given below point out the correct explanation.
Assertion I: Moral derangement is a state of will and turns to be the vehicle of vicious actions.
Reason II: Crime is committed under the influence of instructive and irresistible impulse.
– Moral insanity or imbecility is not exempted from criminal liability as per Section 53 of IPC.
– Both I and II are correct statements to attract criminal liability as per Section 53 IPC as both are diabolical criminal conduct.
– Only by II criminal responsibility can be fixed but not with the help of I.
– Mc Naghten’s Rule can be applied in I but not in II.

Q. Read Assertion I and Reason II and with the help of given codes point out the correct explanation.
Assertion I: Consent of husband or wife of the victim does not grant immunity from the offence of bigamy.
Reason II: Sexual offence with the consent of one spouse does not fix liability for adultery.
– I is correct, but not with the reason of II.
– I is correct, but with the support of II.
– II is only the correct proposition while I is void.
– II is valid when I is not admissible.

Q. Read Assertion I and Reason II and with the help of codes given below point out the correct explanation.
Assertion I: To establish a charge of conspiracy, knowledge about indulgence in an illegal act by certain legal means, is necessary.
Reason II: The normal rule is that when a particular unlawful use being intended has to be inferred from the chain ofactions.
– I is the judicious cause of conspiracy, because II is the correct explanation.
– II is more appropriate explanation than merely fixing charge as per I.
– I is the correct proposition as II is optional.
– I is not correct because as per II there must be pre-meditation.

Q. Read Assertion I and Reason II and with the help of codes given below point out the correct explanation.
Assertion I: Publishing a report of proceedings of a Court will not amount to defamation.
Reason II: It is an exception to the principle of defamation.
– I is true, because II is the specific objective.
– I is true, but II is not the correct proposition.
– II is always true, because I isnot dependent.
– II is false, because I is always independent of criminal liability.

Q. Read Assertion I and Reason II and with the help of codes given below point out the correct explanation.
Assertion I: Independently putting a person in fear of injury to another is extortion.
Reason II: It is an exception to the rule of delivering the valuable security.
– I istrue, but II is not the correct statement.
– I is true, because II is the correct proposition.
– Both I and II are independent of proof.
– Both I and II are false.

Q. Read Assertion I and Reason II and with the help of codes given below find out the correct explanation.
Assertion I: Disorder of mind which impairs the mental faculties is known as unsoundness of mind as such it acts as defence to a criminal charge.
Reason II: Insanity is the mental abnormality and when it impairs the cognitive faculty and if an act results during that period criminal liability could be exempted.
– By I there is transgression of harmful acts while II refers to established rules of society for which no prosecution stands.
– Both I and II are correct explanations as per Section 84 of IPC.
– II is more precise while I isonly a supportive factor.
– The true test of I and II is to apply Mc Naghten’s Rule.

Q. The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, and the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, were passed by the Parliament under:
– Article 252 of the Constitutionof India.
– Article 253 of the Constitution of India.
– Article 250 of the Constitution of India.
– None of the choices.

Q. Which of the following Judges of the Supreme Court is famously known as the “Green Judge”?
– Justice V.R. Krishna Iyyar
– Justice P.N. Bhagwati
– Justice Kuldip Singh
– Justice B.N. Kirpal

Q. Which of the following Articles of the Constitution of India have been mostly used by the Supreme Court to protect environment?
– Article 32
– Article 21
– Both Articles 21 and 32
– None of the choices

Q. What is the period of notice required to be served upon the Central Government for filing a criminal complaint by any person, under the provisions of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986?
– Not less than 30 days
– Not less than 60 days
– Not less than 90 days
– None of the choices

Q. Which one of the following cases is considered as “High Water-mark case in Forest Protection” decided by the Supreme Court?
– Salebhai Mulla Mohmadali vs. State of Gujarat.
– T.N. Godavarman Tirumulkpad vs. Union of India.
– Narmada Bachao Andolan vs. Union of India.
– Samatha vs. State of Andhra Pradesh.

Q. The Parliament enacted the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 for the control of water pollution:
– On the request from States.
– Of his own.
– On the direction of United Nations.
– On the direction of Supreme Court.

Q. Under which of the following Articleof the Constitution of India, theprovisions regarding duty of the State “to protect and improvement of environment and safeguard the forest and wildlife”, exist?
– Article 51(g)
– Article 47
– Article 48-A
– None of the choices

Q. Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and with the help of codes given below write the correct answer.
Assertion (A): Under International law extradition is mostly a matter of bilateral treaties.
Reason (R): There is no general duty of States in respect of extradition of criminals.
– Both (A) and (R) are individually true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
– Both (A) and (R) are individually true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
– (A) is true, but (R) is false.
– (A) is false, but (R) is true.

Q. Which of the following case does not concern with the judgement that a non-recognized State cannot sue in the courts of the State which was not recognized?
– Russian Socialist Federated Soviet Republic vs. Cibraria.
– Guarantee Trust Company of New York vs. United States.
– U.S. vs. Pink.
– Bank of Ethiopia vs. National Bank of Egypt and Liquori.

Q. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer:

List – I (Name of the Case)
(a)The Caroline case
(b)The Nottebohm case
(c)Re Castioni case
(d)U.S. vs. Rouscher

List – II (Principle Propounded)
(i) Self- Defence
(ii) Effective Nationality
(iii) Non- Extradition of Political Criminals
(iv) Rule of Specialty
– a-(i) b-(ii) c-(iii) d-(iv)
– a-(iv) b-(iii) c-(ii) d-(i)
– a-(iii) b-(iv) c-(i) d-(ii)
– a-(ii) b-(i) c-(iv) d-(iii)

Q. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer:

List – I
(a)Australia and Prussiaexercised jointsovereignty over
(b)Great Britain and France exercised joint sovereignty over
(c)Great Britain exercised sovereignty over
(d)In 1898 China leased the district of Kiaochow to

List – II
(i) New Helarides
(ii) Schleswig Holstein Anenburg
(iii) Germany
(iv) Turkish Island
– a-(ii) b-(i) c-(iv) d-(iii)
– a-(i) b-(ii) c-(iii) d-(iv)
– a-(iv) b-(iii) c-(ii) d-(i)
– a-(iii) b-(iv) c-(i) d-(ii)

Q. Which of the following statements is correct? A de-facto government is government:
– Whose origin and existence is contrary to the Constitutional law of the State concerned and legality is challenged in International law.
– Whose origin and existence is in conformity with the Constitutional law of the State represented and whose legality is uncontested in International law.
– Which exercise control over a Foreign State?
– Which has been forced to leave the territory of its State due to enemy occupation or civil war?

Q. Under which of the following Article of the U.N. Charter there is an obligation to inform the Security Council if the regional arrangements take any enforcement action for maintenance of peace and security?
– Article 51
– Article 54
– Article 107
– Article 108

Q. In which one of the following cases the permanent court of International justice held, “it is a generally acceptable principle of international law that in relations, between powers, who are contracting parties to a treaty, the provisions of the municipal law cannot prevail over the treaty”?
– Navlilaa Incident Case
– Greco, Bulgarian Communities Case.
– Panevezys Saldutiskis Railway Case
– Polish Postal Service Case

Q. The wife’s sister’s daughter’s son can be adopted. The adoption is
– Void
– Valid
– Voidable
– None of the choices

Q. Kritrima Adoption is prevalent in which areas of India?
– Madras
– Banaras
– Avadh
– Mithila

Q. In which case the Supreme Court held that “Cohabitation leads to presumption that person are living as husband and wife”?
– Balasubramaniyam vs. Suruttayan AIR 1992 SC 756
– Seema vs. Ashwin Kumar AIR 2006 SC 1158
– Vishnu Prakash vs. Sheela Devi (2001) 4 SCC 729
– None of the choices.

Q. In which of the case, the Supreme Court held that it is desirable that “all marriages should be Compulsorily Registered in the State, where they are solemnized”?
– S. Nagalingamvs. Sivagani AIR (2001) SC 3576
– Shanti Dev Berma vs. K.P. Devi AIR (1991) SC 816
– SeemaVs Ashwin Kumar AIR 2006 SC 1158
– None of the choices

Q. Rules relating to prohibited degrees are based on the principle of
– Monogamy
– Polygamy
– Exogamy
– Endogamy

Authentic Feedback from previous LawMint users :

I got AIR 21 in CLAT PG. Thank you so much. Your mocks helped me a lot in my preparation 🙂 - Ayushi Jain

I have subscribed to your CLAT PG program and got AIR 36 in this year CLAT PG. I have also secured AIR 54 in AILET PG exam. I would like to thank you. Your mock paper really helps a lot - Shrashank Tripathi

I would like to thank you for the CLAT PG LLM COURSE. Practising mock tests there helped me in getting confidence and hence I was able to get AIR 45 in CLAT PG LLM - Akshay Awasthi

A year back, I relied on the IIT Kharagpur RGSOIPL mock test series by LawMint to prepare for my RGSOIPL entrance test. Few months back, I relied on your UGC NET Law series to prepare for UGC NET. I was the topper of the RGSOIPL entrance, and have cracked JRF in UGC NET. All thanks to LawMint - Anshuman Sahoo

"I got AIR 18 in CLAT PG and General Category rank 28 in AILET PG. I want to thank you for helping me practice well in controlled conditions from any place. It gave me a lot of confidence and I took the tests while travelling too. I also made it to IIT Kharagpur." - Vinodharani

"Lawmint has been of great help to me in securing AIR 25 in AILET PG and AIR 29 in CLAT PG examinations. The subjective and objective approach of the test series kept me up to date with the latest exam pattern." - Bhawna Nanda

"I, Nimmy Saira Zachariah joined you clat test series. I cleared AILET PG with 30th rank. Your test series were of immense help as it gave me clear idea of where my preparations stand thank you once again law mint." - Nimmy S Z

"Hey guys. Where do I start? If I thought that getting AIR 59 in Clat PG was it, then how wrong I was. With Lawmint now I have cracked UGC NET as well." - Joyanta Chakraborty

---