UGC NET CBSE Paper II Law 2013 September Question Paper

UGC NET Law 2024 and 2025 - 100 Mock Tests Series & Previous Question Papers

  • Latest Pattern Mock Tests including comprehension based questions
  • Previous Question Papers with Answer Keys - From 2004 till the most recent exam
  • 75 Full Length Mock Tests - New Pattern Paper II, with 100 questions each
  • 50 Mini Practice Mock tests - with 25 questions each
  • Unlimited Practice - New Questions in every attempt of all mocks
  • Questions & Answer Choices randomly shuffled in every attempt for better practice
  • Database of over 11000+ MCQs covering the entire syllabus
  • Unlimited access and practice for one year from the date of purchase
  • Accessible 24 x 7 via Smart-Phone browsers and Desktops

Authentic Feedback from previous LawMint users :

I got AIR 21 in CLAT PG. Thank you so much. Your mocks helped me a lot in my preparation 🙂 - Ayushi Jain

I have subscribed to your CLAT PG program and got AIR 36 in this year CLAT PG. I have also secured AIR 54 in AILET PG exam. I would like to thank you. Your mock paper really helps a lot - Shrashank Tripathi

I would like to thank you for the CLAT PG LLM COURSE. Practising mock tests there helped me in getting confidence and hence I was able to get AIR 45 in CLAT PG LLM - Akshay Awasthi

A year back, I relied on the IIT Kharagpur RGSOIPL mock test series by LawMint to prepare for my RGSOIPL entrance test. Few months back, I relied on your UGC NET Law series to prepare for UGC NET. I was the topper of the RGSOIPL entrance, and have cracked JRF in UGC NET. All thanks to LawMint - Anshuman Sahoo

"I got AIR 18 in CLAT PG and General Category rank 28 in AILET PG. I want to thank you for helping me practice well in controlled conditions from any place. It gave me a lot of confidence and I took the tests while travelling too. I also made it to IIT Kharagpur." - Vinodharani

"Lawmint has been of great help to me in securing AIR 25 in AILET PG and AIR 29 in CLAT PG examinations. The subjective and objective approach of the test series kept me up to date with the latest exam pattern." - Bhawna Nanda

"I, Nimmy Saira Zachariah joined you clat test series. I cleared AILET PG with 30th rank. Your test series were of immense help as it gave me clear idea of where my preparations stand thank you once again law mint." - Nimmy S Z

"Hey guys. Where do I start? If I thought that getting AIR 59 in Clat PG was it, then how wrong I was. With Lawmint now I have cracked UGC NET as well." - Joyanta Chakraborty

Q. No customer in a thousand ever read the conditions. If he had stopped to do, he would have missed the train or the boat. This observation was made by
– Anson
– Donaldson
– Lord Denning
– Pearson

Q. When consent is given due to mistake, an agreement will be
– Voidable
– Legal
– Illegal
– Void

Q. A person is responsible in law of tort for
– all the consequences of his act.
– all the consequences which are not remote.
– all the consequences which directly flow from his act.
– all the consequences which are reasonably foreseeable.

Q. There is a school by the side of the road. Three children of nursery class stray away from the school on to the road. A truck driver, who was driving the truck at a normal speed, notices the children. While trying to save the children, the truck hits a shop and an injury is caused to one person. Which of the following assertions correctly represent the law?
– The school management is liable as they are negligent in not keeping the children within the school premises.
– The truck driver is liable as he did not take proper care.
– The children are liable as they contributed to the accident.
– None is liable as it is a pure accident.

Q. Match List-I with List-II. Use the code below to select the right answer.

List – I
a. Donoghue V. Stevenson
b. In re Polemis
c. M.C. Mehta V. Union of India
d. Lloyd V. Grace Smith & Co.

List – II
1. Remoteness of damages
2. Absolute liability
3. Neighbour principle
4. Vicarious liability
– a-2 b-3 c-4 d-1
– a-2 b-3 c-1 d-4
– a-3 b-1 c-4 d-2
– a-3 b-1 c-2 d-4

Q. When an injury is caused by the act of an enterprise engaged in a hazardous or inherently dangerous activity, the enterprise is absolutely liable for the injury because
1. it has not taken reasonable care.
2. the enterprise owes an absolute and non-delegable duty to the community to ensure that no harm results from the activity.
3. it is considered as a part of the social cost for carrying on the hazardous or inherently dangerous activity.
4. it is difficult to prove lack of care on the part of enterprise.
Select the right code:
– 1 and 2 are correct.
– 1 and 4 are correct.
– 1 and 3 are correct.
– 2 and 3 are correct.

Q. D employs a driver Z to drive his car. D specifically instructs the driver not to drive fast and in no case exceed the speed of 50 kms per hour. Z exceeds the limit and causes the accident in which P is injured. In an action against D for damages
– D is not vicariously liable for the act of the driver because the driver acted against the express instructions of his master.
– D is not liable as the act of the driver was not done during the course of employment.
– D is liable as the driver was doing an authorised act in an unauthorised manner.
– D is not liable as there was contract for service between D and the driver.

Q. Due to the negligence of the owners of a well, it was filled with poisonous gases and two of the employees were trapped inside the well. B, an expert in disaster management in such situation, was called to rescue the two employees. B decided to go inside the well with the help of a rope in order to save the employees trapped in the well. He was warned of the risk involved. Despite all this B went inside the well and was overcome by the gases. He was taken to hospital where he died. B’s wife sued the owners of the well for compensation.
– Owners are not liable because maxim volunti non fit injuria applies.
– Owners are not liable because B was an expert and master of his trade.
– Owners are liable because the act of B was the natural and probable consequence of owner’s negligent act.
– Owners are liable because B died while being engaged by them.

Q. Malignantly and maliciously are synonyms. There is only one provision of Indian Penal Code which covers both the aspect.
Provide the correct answer:
– Section 153
– Section 270
– Section 219
– Section 220

Q. The Indian Penal Code no more denote a positive evil intent for fixing liability, however there are certain type of act which signifies want of care as culpable resulting out of breach of duty. What it is known as?
– Rashly
– Negligently
– Both Rashly and Negligently
– None of the choices

Q. Assertion (A): Common intention implies a pre-arranged plan, prior meeting of minds and prior consultation between all the persons committing the crime.
Reason (R): The law makes no distinction between the persons or the part played by them in doing the criminal act.
– (A) is true and (R) is false.
– (A) and (R) are both true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
– (A) is false and (R) is true.
– Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is most nearest explanation of (A).

Q. Assertion (A): Culpable homicide becomes murder when the act causes death and is done with the intention of causing death.
Reason (R): One of the conditions to be satisfied for treating it murder provide the injury intended to be inflicted is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death.
– (A) is true, but (R) is not the reason.
– (A) and (R) are both true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
– (A) is false and (R) is true.
– Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the reasonable explanation of (A).

Q. An agreement of which either the object or the means employed are illegal, but does not itself constitute an offence is known as ______.
– Intimidation
– Conspiracy
– Abetment
– All of the choices

Q. The act of causing death to a person who has committed or attempted to commit house breaking by night is known as ______.
– Marginal excess of right to private defence.
– Purported exercise of right of self defence.
– Murder
– No detached objectivity would be possible to weigh the culpability.

Q. A Seven Judges Bench of the Supreme Court considered the scope of Industry and laid down a Triple Test Formula in one of the following cases:
– State of Bombay Vs Bombay Hospital Mazdoor Sabha, AIR 1960 SC.
– Bangalore Water Supply Vs. A. Rajappa, AIR 1978 SC.
– D.N. Bannerji Vs. P.R. Mukherjee, AIR 1953 SC.
– University of Delhi Vs. Ramnath, AIR 1963 SC.

Q. Out of the following one of the modes is not a dispute settlement under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947.
– Conciliation
– Adjudication
– Alternate Dispute Resolution
– Arbitration

Q. The qualifications of a person who cannot be appointed as presiding officer of the Labour Court.
– He is or has been a Judge of a High Court.
– He has for a period of not less than three years, been a District Judge or an Additional District Judge.
– He has been Civil Judge for 2 years.
– He has held any Judicial Office in India for not less than seven years.

Q. The Registrar cannot withdraw or cancel registration of a Trade Union if
– the application of the Trade Union is in the proper form on verification.
– the certificate of registration has been obtained by fraud or mistake.
– the Trade Union has ceased to exist.
– the Trade Union has wilfully after a notice from the Registrar contravened the Provisions of the Act.

Q. Any person who has attained the following age may be a member of a registered Trade Union.
– 18 years
– 17 years
– 16 years
– 15 years

Q. The workmen are not entitled to lay off compensation in one of the following cases:
– An industrial establishment in which less than fifty workmen on an average per working day have been employed.
– An industrial establishment in which less than one hundred workmen on an average per working day have been employed.
– An industrial establishment in which less than two hundred and fifty workmen on an average per working day have been employed.
– An industrial establishment in which less than five hundred workmen on an average per working day have been employed.

UGC NET Law 2024 and 2025 - 100 Mock Tests Series & Previous Question Papers

  • Latest Pattern Mock Tests including comprehension based questions
  • Previous Question Papers with Answer Keys - From 2004 till the most recent exam
  • 75 Full Length Mock Tests - New Pattern Paper II, with 100 questions each
  • 50 Mini Practice Mock tests - with 25 questions each
  • Unlimited Practice - New Questions in every attempt of all mocks
  • Questions & Answer Choices randomly shuffled in every attempt for better practice
  • Database of over 11000+ MCQs covering the entire syllabus
  • Unlimited access and practice for one year from the date of purchase
  • Accessible 24 x 7 via Smart-Phone browsers and Desktops

Authentic Feedback from previous LawMint users :

I got AIR 21 in CLAT PG. Thank you so much. Your mocks helped me a lot in my preparation 🙂 - Ayushi Jain

I have subscribed to your CLAT PG program and got AIR 36 in this year CLAT PG. I have also secured AIR 54 in AILET PG exam. I would like to thank you. Your mock paper really helps a lot - Shrashank Tripathi

I would like to thank you for the CLAT PG LLM COURSE. Practising mock tests there helped me in getting confidence and hence I was able to get AIR 45 in CLAT PG LLM - Akshay Awasthi

A year back, I relied on the IIT Kharagpur RGSOIPL mock test series by LawMint to prepare for my RGSOIPL entrance test. Few months back, I relied on your UGC NET Law series to prepare for UGC NET. I was the topper of the RGSOIPL entrance, and have cracked JRF in UGC NET. All thanks to LawMint - Anshuman Sahoo

"I got AIR 18 in CLAT PG and General Category rank 28 in AILET PG. I want to thank you for helping me practice well in controlled conditions from any place. It gave me a lot of confidence and I took the tests while travelling too. I also made it to IIT Kharagpur." - Vinodharani

"Lawmint has been of great help to me in securing AIR 25 in AILET PG and AIR 29 in CLAT PG examinations. The subjective and objective approach of the test series kept me up to date with the latest exam pattern." - Bhawna Nanda

"I, Nimmy Saira Zachariah joined you clat test series. I cleared AILET PG with 30th rank. Your test series were of immense help as it gave me clear idea of where my preparations stand thank you once again law mint." - Nimmy S Z

"Hey guys. Where do I start? If I thought that getting AIR 59 in Clat PG was it, then how wrong I was. With Lawmint now I have cracked UGC NET as well." - Joyanta Chakraborty

This is the UGC NET Question Paper II from the exam conducted by CBSE in September 2013.
Answer to this UGC NET question paper and all other UGC CBSE NET papers published on LawMint.com are available for registered users of our Online Prep Packs.

2013 September Previous Paper 2 Law UGC NET CBSE LawMint.com