UGC NET NTA June 2011 Question Paper 1 Mock Test

UGC NTA NET Paper 1 - HECI - Previous Question Papers Mock Tests June 2011

UGC NET Law 2020 - 100 Mock Tests Series & Previous Question Papers

  • Mock Tests include comprehension based questions - introduced in Dec 2019 exam
  • Law Subjects Overview Material covering important topics and concepts - PDF Book
  • Previous Question Papers with Answer Keys - From 2004 till 2019
  • 50 Full Length Mock Tests - New Pattern Paper II, with 100 questions each
  • 50 Mini Practice Mock tests - with 25 questions each
  • Unlimited Practice - New Questions in every mock test with every attempt
  • Answer choices of all questions shuffled randomly for better practice
  • Database of over 9500 MCQs covering the entire syllabus
  • Includes new comprehension based questions
  • Questions & Answer Choices randomly shuffled in every attempt for better practice
  • Accessible 24 x 7 via Smart-Phone browsers and Desktops
Authentic Feedback from previous exam users :

"Just wanted to let you know that I have cleared JRF with 99.99th percentile. Thank you for all your help and support that made it possible. " - Kanchan Yadav

"Thank you so much for the UGC NET test series. I finally qualified the exam. It was possible because of the mock test series provided by your team." - Robin Jaiswal

Note : Answer Keys to all Previous Question Papers published on LawMint are available to registered users of LawMint.com Online Practice Packs.

Check out all the HECI NTA NET or UGC CBSE NET Paper 1 previous question papers here : Previous Papers & Mock Tests
Note : UGC has rolled out a revised syllabus for both Papers 1 & 2 from Jan 2019 onward.


1. A research paper is a brief report of research work based on
– Primary Data only
– Secondary Data only
– Both Primary and Secondary Data
– None of the given choices

2. Newton gave three basic laws of motion. This research is categorized as
– Descriptive Research
– Sample Survey
– Fundamental Research
– Applied Research

3. A group of experts in a specific area of knowledge assembled at a place and prepared a syllabus for a new course. The process may be termed as
– Seminar
– Workshop
– Conference
– Symposium

4. In the process of conducting research “Formulation of Hypothesis” is followed by
– Statement of Objectives
– Analysis of Data
– Selection of Research Tools
– Collection of Data

5. Read the following passage carefully and answer the question :

All historians are interpreters of text if they be private letters, Government records or parish birthlists or whatever. For most kinds of historians, these are only the necessary means to understanding something other than the texts themselves, such as a political action or a historical trend, whereas for the intellectual historian, a full understanding of his chosen texts is itself the aim of his enquiries. Of course, the intellectual history is particularly prone to draw on the focus of other disciplines that are habitually interpreting texts for purposes of their own, probing the reasoning that ostensibly connects premises and conclusions.

Furthermore, the boundaries with adjacent subdisciplines are shifting and indistinct : the history of art and the history of science both claim a certain autonomy, partly just because they require specialised technical skills, but both can also be seen as part of a wider intellectual history, as is evident when one considers, for example, the common stock of knowledge about cosmological beliefs or moral ideals of a period.

Like all historians, the intellectual historian is a consumer rather than a producer of ‘methods’. His distinctiveness lies in which aspect of the past he is trying to illuminate, not in having exclusive possession of either a corpus of evidence or a body of techniques. That being said, it does seem that the label ‘intellectual history’ attracts a disproportionate share of misunderstanding.

It is alleged that intellectual history is the history of something that never really mattered. The long dominance of the historical profession by political historians bred a kind of philistinism, an unspoken belief that power and its exercise was ‘what mattered’.

The prejudice was reinforced by the assertion that political action was never really the outcome of principles or ideas that were ‘more flapdoodle’. The legacy of this precept is still discernible in the tendency to require ideas to have ‘licensed’ the political class before they can be deemed worthy of intellectual attention, as if there were some reasons why the history of art or science, of philosophy or literature, were somehow of interest and significance than the history of Parties or Parliaments. Perhaps in recent years the mirror-image of this philistinism has been more common in the claim that ideas of any one is of systematic expression or sophistication do not matter, as if they were only held by a minority.

An intellectual historian aims to fully understand
– the chosen texts of his own
– political actions
– historical trends
– his enquiries

6. Read the following passage carefully and answer the question :

All historians are interpreters of text if they be private letters, Government records or parish birthlists or whatever. For most kinds of historians, these are only the necessary means to understanding something other than the texts themselves, such as a political action or a historical trend, whereas for the intellectual historian, a full understanding of his chosen texts is itself the aim of his enquiries. Of course, the intellectual history is particularly prone to draw on the focus of other disciplines that are habitually interpreting texts for purposes of their own, probing the reasoning that ostensibly connects premises and conclusions.

Furthermore, the boundaries with adjacent subdisciplines are shifting and indistinct : the history of art and the history of science both claim a certain autonomy, partly just because they require specialised technical skills, but both can also be seen as part of a wider intellectual history, as is evident when one considers, for example, the common stock of knowledge about cosmological beliefs or moral ideals of a period.

Like all historians, the intellectual historian is a consumer rather than a producer of ‘methods’. His distinctiveness lies in which aspect of the past he is trying to illuminate, not in having exclusive possession of either a corpus of evidence or a body of techniques. That being said, it does seem that the label ‘intellectual history’ attracts a disproportionate share of misunderstanding.

It is alleged that intellectual history is the history of something that never really mattered. The long dominance of the historical profession by political historians bred a kind of philistinism, an unspoken belief that power and its exercise was ‘what mattered’.

The prejudice was reinforced by the assertion that political action was never really the outcome of principles or ideas that were ‘more flapdoodle’. The legacy of this precept is still discernible in the tendency to require ideas to have ‘licensed’ the political class before they can be deemed worthy of intellectual attention, as if there were some reasons why the history of art or science, of philosophy or literature, were somehow of interest and significance than the history of Parties or Parliaments. Perhaps in recent years the mirror-image of this philistinism has been more common in the claim that ideas of any one is of systematic expression or sophistication do not matter, as if they were only held by a minority.

Intellectual historians do not claim exclusive possession of
– conclusions
– any corpus of evidence
– distinctiveness
– habitual interpretation

7. Read the following passage carefully and answer the question :

All historians are interpreters of text if they be private letters, Government records or parish birthlists or whatever. For most kinds of historians, these are only the necessary means to understanding something other than the texts themselves, such as a political action or a historical trend, whereas for the intellectual historian, a full understanding of his chosen texts is itself the aim of his enquiries. Of course, the intellectual history is particularly prone to draw on the focus of other disciplines that are habitually interpreting texts for purposes of their own, probing the reasoning that ostensibly connects premises and conclusions.

Furthermore, the boundaries with adjacent subdisciplines are shifting and indistinct : the history of art and the history of science both claim a certain autonomy, partly just because they require specialised technical skills, but both can also be seen as part of a wider intellectual history, as is evident when one considers, for example, the common stock of knowledge about cosmological beliefs or moral ideals of a period.

Like all historians, the intellectual historian is a consumer rather than a producer of ‘methods’. His distinctiveness lies in which aspect of the past he is trying to illuminate, not in having exclusive possession of either a corpus of evidence or a body of techniques. That being said, it does seem that the label ‘intellectual history’ attracts a disproportionate share of misunderstanding.

It is alleged that intellectual history is the history of something that never really mattered. The long dominance of the historical profession by political historians bred a kind of philistinism, an unspoken belief that power and its exercise was ‘what mattered’.

The prejudice was reinforced by the assertion that political action was never really the outcome of principles or ideas that were ‘more flapdoodle’. The legacy of this precept is still discernible in the tendency to require ideas to have ‘licensed’ the political class before they can be deemed worthy of intellectual attention, as if there were some reasons why the history of art or science, of philosophy or literature, were somehow of interest and significance than the history of Parties or Parliaments. Perhaps in recent years the mirror-image of this philistinism has been more common in the claim that ideas of any one is of systematic expression or sophistication do not matter, as if they were only held by a minority.

The misconceptions about intellectual history stem from
– a body of techniques
– the common stock of knowledge
– the dominance of political historians
– cosmological beliefs

8. Read the following passage carefully and answer the question :

All historians are interpreters of text if they be private letters, Government records or parish birthlists or whatever. For most kinds of historians, these are only the necessary means to understanding something other than the texts themselves, such as a political action or a historical trend, whereas for the intellectual historian, a full understanding of his chosen texts is itself the aim of his enquiries. Of course, the intellectual history is particularly prone to draw on the focus of other disciplines that are habitually interpreting texts for purposes of their own, probing the reasoning that ostensibly connects premises and conclusions.

Furthermore, the boundaries with adjacent subdisciplines are shifting and indistinct : the history of art and the history of science both claim a certain autonomy, partly just because they require specialised technical skills, but both can also be seen as part of a wider intellectual history, as is evident when one considers, for example, the common stock of knowledge about cosmological beliefs or moral ideals of a period.

Like all historians, the intellectual historian is a consumer rather than a producer of ‘methods’. His distinctiveness lies in which aspect of the past he is trying to illuminate, not in having exclusive possession of either a corpus of evidence or a body of techniques. That being said, it does seem that the label ‘intellectual history’ attracts a disproportionate share of misunderstanding.

It is alleged that intellectual history is the history of something that never really mattered. The long dominance of the historical profession by political historians bred a kind of philistinism, an unspoken belief that power and its exercise was ‘what mattered’.

The prejudice was reinforced by the assertion that political action was never really the outcome of principles or ideas that were ‘more flapdoodle’. The legacy of this precept is still discernible in the tendency to require ideas to have ‘licensed’ the political class before they can be deemed worthy of intellectual attention, as if there were some reasons why the history of art or science, of philosophy or literature, were somehow of interest and significance than the history of Parties or Parliaments. Perhaps in recent years the mirror-image of this philistinism has been more common in the claim that ideas of any one is of systematic expression or sophistication do not matter, as if they were only held by a minority.

What is philistinism?
– Reinforcement of prejudice
– Fabrication of reasons
– The hold of land-owning classes
– Belief that power and its exercise matter

9. Read the following passage carefully and answer the question :

All historians are interpreters of text if they be private letters, Government records or parish birthlists or whatever. For most kinds of historians, these are only the necessary means to understanding something other than the texts themselves, such as a political action or a historical trend, whereas for the intellectual historian, a full understanding of his chosen texts is itself the aim of his enquiries. Of course, the intellectual history is particularly prone to draw on the focus of other disciplines that are habitually interpreting texts for purposes of their own, probing the reasoning that ostensibly connects premises and conclusions.

Furthermore, the boundaries with adjacent subdisciplines are shifting and indistinct : the history of art and the history of science both claim a certain autonomy, partly just because they require specialised technical skills, but both can also be seen as part of a wider intellectual history, as is evident when one considers, for example, the common stock of knowledge about cosmological beliefs or moral ideals of a period.

Like all historians, the intellectual historian is a consumer rather than a producer of ‘methods’. His distinctiveness lies in which aspect of the past he is trying to illuminate, not in having exclusive possession of either a corpus of evidence or a body of techniques. That being said, it does seem that the label ‘intellectual history’ attracts a disproportionate share of misunderstanding.

It is alleged that intellectual history is the history of something that never really mattered. The long dominance of the historical profession by political historians bred a kind of philistinism, an unspoken belief that power and its exercise was ‘what mattered’.

The prejudice was reinforced by the assertion that political action was never really the outcome of principles or ideas that were ‘more flapdoodle’. The legacy of this precept is still discernible in the tendency to require ideas to have ‘licensed’ the political class before they can be deemed worthy of intellectual attention, as if there were some reasons why the history of art or science, of philosophy or literature, were somehow of interest and significance than the history of Parties or Parliaments. Perhaps in recent years the mirror-image of this philistinism has been more common in the claim that ideas of any one is of systematic expression or sophistication do not matter, as if they were only held by a minority.

Knowledge of cosmological beliefs or moral ideas of a period can be drawn as part of
– literary criticism
– history of science
– history of philosophy
– intellectual history

10. Read the following passage carefully and answer the question :

All historians are interpreters of text if they be private letters, Government records or parish birthlists or whatever. For most kinds of historians, these are only the necessary means to understanding something other than the texts themselves, such as a political action or a historical trend, whereas for the intellectual historian, a full understanding of his chosen texts is itself the aim of his enquiries. Of course, the intellectual history is particularly prone to draw on the focus of other disciplines that are habitually interpreting texts for purposes of their own, probing the reasoning that ostensibly connects premises and conclusions.

Furthermore, the boundaries with adjacent subdisciplines are shifting and indistinct : the history of art and the history of science both claim a certain autonomy, partly just because they require specialised technical skills, but both can also be seen as part of a wider intellectual history, as is evident when one considers, for example, the common stock of knowledge about cosmological beliefs or moral ideals of a period.

Like all historians, the intellectual historian is a consumer rather than a producer of ‘methods’. His distinctiveness lies in which aspect of the past he is trying to illuminate, not in having exclusive possession of either a corpus of evidence or a body of techniques. That being said, it does seem that the label ‘intellectual history’ attracts a disproportionate share of misunderstanding.

It is alleged that intellectual history is the history of something that never really mattered. The long dominance of the historical profession by political historians bred a kind of philistinism, an unspoken belief that power and its exercise was ‘what mattered’.

The prejudice was reinforced by the assertion that political action was never really the outcome of principles or ideas that were ‘more flapdoodle’. The legacy of this precept is still discernible in the tendency to require ideas to have ‘licensed’ the political class before they can be deemed worthy of intellectual attention, as if there were some reasons why the history of art or science, of philosophy or literature, were somehow of interest and significance than the history of Parties or Parliaments. Perhaps in recent years the mirror-image of this philistinism has been more common in the claim that ideas of any one is of systematic expression or sophistication do not matter, as if they were only held by a minority.

The claim that ideas of any one is of systematic expression do not matter, as if they were held by a minority, is
– to have a licensed political class
– a political action
– a philosophy of literature
– the mirror-image of philistinism

11. Public communication tends to occur within a more
– complex structure
– political structure
– convenient structure
– formal structure

12. Transforming thoughts, ideas and messages into verbal and non-verbal signs is referred to as
– channelisation
– mediation
– encoding
– decoding

13. Effective communication needs a supportive
– economic environment
– political environment
– social environment
– multi-cultural environment

14. A major barrier in the transmission of cognitive data in the process of communication is an individual’s
– personality
– expectation
– social status
– coding ability

15. When communicated, institutionalised stereotypes become
– myths
– reasons
– experiences
– convictions

16. In mass communication, selective perception is dependent on the receiver’s
– competence
– pre-disposition
– receptivity
– ethnicity

17. Determine the relationship between the pair of words NUMERATOR : DENOMINATOR and then select the pair of words from the following which have a similar relationship :
– fraction : decimal
– divisor : quotient
– top : bottom
– dividend : divisor

18. Find the wrong number in the sequence : 125, 127, 130, 135, 142, 153, 165
– 130
– 142
– 153
– 165

19. If HOBBY is coded as IOBY and LOBBY is coded as MOBY; then BOBBY is coded as
– BOBY
– COBY
– DOBY
– OOBY

20. The letters in the first set have certain relationship. On the basis of this relationship, make the right choice for the second set:
K/T : 11/20 :: J/R : ?
– 10/8
– 10/18
– 11/19
– 10/19

21. If A = 5, B = 6, C = 7, D = 8 and so on, what do the following numbers stand for?
17, 19, 20, 9, 8
– Plane
– Moped
– Motor
– Tonga

22. The price of oil is increased by 25%. If the expenditure is not allowed to increase, the ratio between the reduction in consumption and the original consumption is
– 1 : 3
– 1 : 4
– 1 : 5
– 1 : 6

23. How many 8’s are there in the following sequence which are preceded by 5 but not immediately followed by 3 ?

5 8 3 7 5 8 6 3 8 5 4 5 8 4 7 6 5 5 8 3 5 8 7 5 8 2 8 5
– 4
– 5
– 7
– 3

24. If a rectangle were called a circle, a circle a point, a point a triangle and a triangle a square, the shape of a wheel is
– Rectangle
– Circle
– Point
– Triangle

25. Which one of the following methods is best suited for mapping the distribution of different crops as provided in the standard classification of crops in India ?
– Pie diagram
– Chorochromatic technique
– Isopleth technique
– Dot method

26. Which one of the following does not come under the methods of data classification ?
– Qualitative
– Normative
– Spatial
– Quantitative

27. Which one of the following is not a source of data ?
– Administrative records
– Population census
– GIS
– Sample survey

28. If the statement ‘some men are cruel’ is false, which of the following statements/statement are/is true ?
(i) All men are cruel.
(ii) No men are cruel.
(iii) Some men are not cruel.
– (i) and (iii)
– (i) and (ii)
– (ii) and (iii)
– (iii) only

29. The octal number system consists of the following symbols :
– 0 – 7
– 0 – 9
– 0 – 9, A – F
– None of the given choices

30. The binary equivalent of (-19)10 in signed magnitude system is
– 11101100
– 11101101
– 10010011
– None of the given choices

31. DNS in internet technology stands for
– Dynamic Name System
– Domain Name System
– Distributed Name System
– None of the given choices

32. HTML stands for
– Hyper Text Markup Language
– Hyper Text Manipulation Language
– Hyper Text Managing Links
– Hyper Text Manipulating Links

33. Which of the following is type of LAN ?
– Ethernet
– Token Ring
– FDDI
– All of the given choices

34. Which of the following statements is true ?
– Smart cards do not require an operating system.
– Smart cards and PCs use some operating system.
– COS is smart card operating system.
– The communication between reader and card is in full duplex mode.

35. The Ganga Action Plan was initiated during the year
– 1986
– 1988
– 1990
– 1992

36. Identify the correct sequence of energy sources in order of their share in the power sector in India :
– Thermal > nuclear > hydro > wind
– Thermal > hydro > nuclear > wind
– Hydro > nuclear > thermal > wind
– Nuclear > hydro > wind > thermal

37. Chromium as a contaminant in drinking water in excess of permissible levels, causes
– Skeletal damage
– Gastrointestinal problem
– Dermal and nervous problems
– Liver/Kidney problems

38. The main precursors of winter smog are
– N2O and hydrocarbons
– NOx and hydrocarbons
– SO2 and hydrocarbons
– SO2 and ozone

39. Flash floods are caused when
– the atmosphere is convectively unstable and there is considerable vertical wind shear
– the atmosphere is stable
– the atmosphere is convectively unstable with no vertical windshear
– winds are catabatic

40. In mega cities of India, the dominant source of air pollution is
– transport sector
– thermal power
– municipal waste
– commercial sector

41. The first Open University in India was set up in the State of
– Andhra Pradesh
– Delhi
– Himachal Pradesh
– Tamil Nadu

42. Most of the Universities in India are funded by
– the Central Government
– the State Governments
– the University Grants Commission
– Private bodies and Individuals

43. Which of the following organizations looks after the quality of Technical and Management education in India ?
– NCTE
– MCI
– AICTE
– CSIR

44. Consider the following statements : Identify the statement which implies natural justice.
– The principle of natural justice is followed by the Courts.
– Justice delayed is justice denied.
– Natural justice is an inalienable right of a citizen
– A reasonable opportunity of being heard must be given.

45. The President of India is
– the Head of State
– the Head of Government
– both Head of the State and the Head of the Government
– None of the given choices

46. Who among the following holds office during the pleasure of the President of India ?
– Chief Election Commissioner
– Comptroller and Auditor General of India
– Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission
– Governor of a State

47. Question is based upon the following diagram in which there are three interlocking circles A, P and S where A stands for Artists, circle P for Professors and circle S for Sportspersons. Different regions in the figure are lettered from a to f:

The region which represents artists who are neither sportsmen nor professors.
– d
– e
– b
– g

48. Question is based upon the following diagram in which there are three interlocking circles A, P and S where A stands for Artists, circle P for Professors and circle S for Sportspersons. Different regions in the figure are lettered from a to f:

The region which represents professors, who are both artists and sportspersons.
– a
– c
– d
– g

49. Question is based upon the following diagram in which there are three interlocking circles A, P and S where A stands for Artists, circle P for Professors and circle S for Sportspersons. Different regions in the figure are lettered from a to f:

The region which represents professors, who are also sportspersons, but not artists.
– e
– f
– c
– g

50. Question is based on the following data :
Measurements of some variable X were made at an interval of 1 minute from 10 A.M. to 10:20 A.M. The data, thus, obtained is as follows :

X : 60, 62, 65, 64, 63, 61, 66, 65, 70, 68, 63, 62, 64, 69, 65, 64, 66, 67, 66, 64

The value of X, which is exceeded 10% of the time in the duration of measurement, is
– 69
– 68
– 67
– 66

51. Question is based on the following data :
Measurements of some variable X were made at an interval of 1 minute from 10 A.M. to 10:20 A.M. The data, thus, obtained is as follows :

X : 60, 62, 65, 64, 63, 61, 66, 65, 70, 68, 63, 62, 64, 69, 65, 64, 66, 67, 66, 64

The value of X, which is exceeded 90% of the time in the duration of measurement, is
– 63
– 62
– 61
– 60

52. Question is based on the following data :
Measurements of some variable X were made at an interval of 1 minute from 10 A.M. to 10:20 A.M. The data, thus, obtained is as follows :

X : 60, 62, 65, 64, 63, 61, 66, 65, 70, 68, 63, 62, 64, 69, 65, 64, 66, 67, 66, 64

The value of X, which is exceeded 50% of the time in the duration of measurement, is
– 66
– 65
– 64
– 63

53. For maintaining an effective discipline in the class, the teacher should
– Allow students to do what they like.
– Deal with the students strictly.
– Give the students some problem to solve.
– Deal with them politely and firmly.

54. An effective teaching aid is one which
– is colourful and good looking
– activates all faculties
– is visible to all students
– easy to prepare and use

55. Those teachers are popular among students who
– develop intimacy with them
– help them solve their problems
– award good grades
– take classes on extra tuition fee

56. The essence of an effective classroom environment is
– a variety of teaching aids
– lively student-teacher interaction
– pin-drop silence
– strict discipline

57. On the first day of his class, if a teacher is asked by the students to introduce himself, he should
– ask them to meet after the class
– tell them about himself in brief
– ignore the demand and start teaching
– scold the student for this unwanted demand

58. Moral values can be effectively inculcated among the students when the teacher
– frequently talks about values
– himself practices them
– tells stories of great persons
– talks of Gods and Goddesses

59. The essential qualities of a researcher are
– spirit of free enquiry
– reliance on observation and evidence
– systematization or theorizing of knowledge
– all the above

60. Research is conducted to
I. Generate new knowledge
II. Not to develop a theory
III. Obtain research degree
IV. Reinterpret existing knowledge

Which of the above are correct ?
– I, III & II
– III, II & IV
– II, I & III
– I, III & IV


UGC NET Law 2020 - 100 Mock Tests Series & Previous Question Papers

  • Mock Tests include comprehension based questions - introduced in Dec 2019 exam
  • Law Subjects Overview Material covering important topics and concepts - PDF Book
  • Previous Question Papers with Answer Keys - From 2004 till 2019
  • 50 Full Length Mock Tests - New Pattern Paper II, with 100 questions each
  • 50 Mini Practice Mock tests - with 25 questions each
  • Unlimited Practice - New Questions in every mock test with every attempt
  • Answer choices of all questions shuffled randomly for better practice
  • Database of over 9500 MCQs covering the entire syllabus
  • Includes new comprehension based questions
  • Questions & Answer Choices randomly shuffled in every attempt for better practice
  • Accessible 24 x 7 via Smart-Phone browsers and Desktops
Authentic Feedback from previous exam users :

"Just wanted to let you know that I have cleared JRF with 99.99th percentile. Thank you for all your help and support that made it possible. " - Kanchan Yadav

"Thank you so much for the UGC NET test series. I finally qualified the exam. It was possible because of the mock test series provided by your team." - Robin Jaiswal

Note : Answer Keys to all Previous Question Papers published on LawMint are available to registered users of our Online Practice Packs.

Check out all the HECI NTA NET or UGC CBSE NET Paper 1 previous question papers here : Previous Papers & Mock Tests

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *