Apart from the opposite party’s place of business or residence and the place where the cause of action arose, which connection allows a complaint in a District Commission under Section 34(2) of the…
Question and options
Apart from the opposite party’s place of business or residence and the place where the cause of action arose, which connection allows a complaint in a District Commission under Section 34(2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019?
The complainant’s advocate ordinarily practises there
The complainant owns immovable property in that district
The complainant’s consumer association is registered there
The complainant resides or personally works for gain there
Answer and explanation
Section 34(2)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 lets a complaint be filed in the District Commission within whose limits the complainant resides or personally works for gain. Owning property, the advocate’s place of practice or an association’s registration does not by itself confer territorial jurisdiction.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions - jurisdiction & procedure
- What is the limitation period for filing a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019?
- Which of the following defines the jurisdiction of District Forum
- Which provision of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 provides for the establishment of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission?
- Statement 1: The remedy under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is an alternative in addition to that already available to the aggrieved persons/consumers by way…
- Under section 34(1) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, read with the Consumer Protection (Jurisdiction of the District Commission, the State Commission and the…