Which of the following are good defenses to the rule of strict liability in 'Law of Tort'? 1. Act of God 2. Statutory Obligation 3. Consent 4. Interference of third party
Question and options
Which of the following are good defenses to the rule of strict liability in 'Law of Tort'?
1. Act of God
2. Statutory Obligation
3. Consent
4. Interference of third party
1. Act of God
2. Statutory Obligation
3. Consent
4. Interference of third party
- 1 and 2 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3 only
- 1, 2, 3 and 4
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: D - 1, 2, 3 and 4
Recognised exceptions to strict liability under Rylands v Fletcher include act of God, statutory authority, consent of the plaintiff, and act of a third party (plus plaintiff's default). All four are good defences.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUSAT CAT LLM
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in Strict & absolute liability
- For application of the rule of strict liability, which of the following essentials is required?
- The Rule of 'Absolute Liability' was laid down in the case
- Which one is leading case on Strict Liability?
- In which of the following cases the doctrine of strict liability was established for the first time?
- M.C.Mehta V.Union of India AIR 1987 SC 965 was a judgement of a bench comprising how many judges ?