Statement I: A person, who moves to a place nearer the place of nuisance, can complain of nuisance.…
'Coming to the nuisance' is not a defence (Sturges v Bridgman; Bliss v Hall), so a person who moves nearer to the place of nuisance may still complain of it: "Statement I is…
Choose your answer
Statement I: A person, who moves to a place nearer the place of nuisance, can complain of nuisance.
Statement II: Coming to the place of nuisance is a good defence.
Answer and explanation
Correct answer C
'Coming to the nuisance' is not a defence (Sturges v Bridgman; Bliss v Hall), so a person who moves nearer to the place of nuisance may still complain of it: "Statement I is true but Statement II is false".
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision