Sahib appointed Sewak as his driver. One day Sahib sent the driver to fetch some goods from a nearby mall. On his way Sewak injured a pedestrian who was trying to cross the road at the zebra…
Question and options
Sahib appointed Sewak as his driver. One day Sahib sent the driver to fetch some goods from a nearby mall. On his way Sewak injured a pedestrian who was trying to cross the road at the zebra crossing as per the traffic signal. Here
- the pedestrian cannot sue Sewak for compensation/damages for the injuries received
- Sahib can direct Sewak to pay the compensation to the pedestrian if proceeded against under law
- the pedestrian can sue Sewak as well as Sahib
- the pedestrian cannot sue Sahib
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: C - the pedestrian can sue Sewak as well as Sahib
Sewak was acting in the course of employment when he injured the pedestrian, so Sewak is personally liable and Sahib is vicariously liable. The pedestrian can sue both.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUSAT CAT LLM
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in Parties & vicarious liability
- What one of the following statements is incorrect?
- The maxim 'qui facit per alium facit per se' means :
- Match the concepts in List I with their descriptions in List II. List I A. Historical common-employment doctrine B. Respondeat superior C. Economic conspiracy D.…
- Apply the legal principle or principles to the given factual situation and select the most appropriate answer. LEGAL PRINCIPLE : In the employer — employee…
- Which of the following was the main issue in Kasturi Lal Ralia Ram Jain v. State of U.P. (AIR 1965 SC 1039)?