Site navigation

Match the items of List I (name of case) with the items of List II (related topic) and choose the…

Jones v. Boyce illustrates the doctrine of alternative danger, Scott v. Shepherd remoteness of damages/causation, A.H. Khodwa v. State of Maharashtra medical negligence, and…

Choose your answer

Match the items of List I (name of case) with the items of List II (related topic) and choose the correct answer from the code given below.

List I (Name of case)List II (Related topic)
(a) Jones vs Boyce(i) Remoteness of damages
(b) Scott vs Shepherd(ii) Medical negligence
(c) A.H. Khodwa vs State of Maharashtra(iii) Nervous shock
(d) Victorian Railway Commissioner vs Coultas(iv) Doctrine of alternative danger
Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer D

Jones v. Boyce illustrates the doctrine of alternative danger, Scott v. Shepherd remoteness of damages/causation, A.H. Khodwa v. State of Maharashtra medical negligence, and Victorian Railway Commissioners v. Coultas nervous shock, giving "(a)-(iv), (b)-(i), (c)-(ii), (d)-(iii)".

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic