Site navigation

Match List I with List II: List IList II (A) Negligence (I) Ryland V Fletcher (B) Strict Liability (II)…

Glasgow Corporation v Muir is a negligence (foreseeability) case, Rylands v Fletcher established strict liability, M.C. Mehta v Union of India laid down absolute liability,…

Choose your answer

Match List I with List II:

List IList II
(A) Negligence(I) Ryland V Fletcher
(B) Strict Liability(II) M.C. Mehta V Union of India
(C) Absolute liability(III) Glasgow corporation vs Muir
(D) Nervous shock(IV) Bourhill V Young
Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer C

Glasgow Corporation v Muir is a negligence (foreseeability) case, Rylands v Fletcher established strict liability, M.C. Mehta v Union of India laid down absolute liability, and Bourhill v Young concerned nervous shock. Hence the matching is "(A) - (III), (B) - (I), (C) - (II), (D) - (IV)".

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic