Match List-I with List-II List-I - Legal MaximList-II - Case Law (A). Injuria sine Damno (I).…
Bhim Singh v. State of Jammu & Kashmir (1985), where an MLA wrongfully detained was awarded compensation though he suffered no tangible loss, illustrates injuria sine damno…
Choose your answer
Match List-I with List-II
| List-I - Legal Maxim | List-II - Case Law |
|---|---|
| (A). Injuria sine Damno | (I). Gloucester Grammar School case |
| (B). Damnum sine Injuria | (II). Nichols v. Marsland |
| (C). Volenti non fit injuria | (III). Bhim Singh v. State of Jammu & Kashmir |
| (D). Force majeure | (IV). Padmavati v. Dugganaika |
Answer and explanation
Correct answer C
Bhim Singh v. State of Jammu & Kashmir (1985), where an MLA wrongfully detained was awarded compensation though he suffered no tangible loss, illustrates injuria sine damno (A-III); the Gloucester Grammar School case (1410), where a rival school's lower fees caused loss without legal injury, illustrates damnum sine injuria (B-I); Padmavati v. Dugganaika (1975), where passengers who voluntarily took a lift in a jeep could not recover, illustrates volenti non fit injuria (C-IV); and Nichols v. Marsland (1876), where extraordinary rainfall burst artificial lakes, illustrates act of God or force majeure (D-II). The matching is "(A) - (III), (B) - (I), (C) - (IV), (D) - (II)".
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision