Match List-I with List-II List-I - Legal Doctrine etc.List-II - Case law (A). Negligence (I). Municipal…
Winterbottom v. Wright (1842), which confined the duty of care by privity of contract and is a landmark in the development of negligence, pairs with negligence (A-III);…
Choose your answer
Match List-I with List-II
| List-I - Legal Doctrine etc. | List-II - Case law |
|---|---|
| (A). Negligence | (I). Municipal Corporation Delhi v Subhagwanti |
| (B). Strict liability | (II). Rylands v Fletcher |
| (C). Res ipsa loquitur | (III). Winterbottom v Wright |
| (D). Nuisance | (IV). Campbell v Paddington Corporation |
Answer and explanation
Correct answer C
Winterbottom v. Wright (1842), which confined the duty of care by privity of contract and is a landmark in the development of negligence, pairs with negligence (A-III); Rylands v. Fletcher (1868) laid down strict liability for the escape of dangerous things brought onto land (B-II); Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Subhagwanti (1966), the Chandni Chowk clock tower collapse, applied res ipsa loquitur (C-I); and Campbell v. Paddington Corporation (1911), where a stand erected on the highway obstructed the plaintiff's view and profits, is a case of nuisance (D-IV). The matching is "(A) - (III), (B) - (II), (C) - (I), (D) - (IV)".
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision