Match List-I (Name of defence) with List-II (Related case) and give the answer by using the code given…
Bird v. Holbrook concerns the defence that the plaintiff was a wrongdoer, Nichols v. Marsland act of God, Stanley v. Powell inevitable accident, and Consolidated Co. v.…
Choose your answer
Match List-I (Name of defence) with List-II (Related case) and give the answer by using the code given below :
| List-I | List-II |
|---|---|
| (a) Plaintiff a wrongdoer | (i) Nichols v. Marsland |
| (b) Act of God | (ii) Bird v. Holbrook |
| (c) Inevitable accident | (iii) Consolidated Co. v. Curtis |
| (d) Mistake | (iv) Stanley v. Powell |
Choose the answer corresponding to the order (a) (b) (c) (d)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer C
Bird v. Holbrook concerns the defence that the plaintiff was a wrongdoer, Nichols v. Marsland act of God, Stanley v. Powell inevitable accident, and Consolidated Co. v. Curtis mistake, giving "(ii) (i) (iv) (iii)".
Practice for these exams
-
UGC NET Law
See pack details on LawMint.net -
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision