Under the Designs Act, 2000, “design” does NOT include
Question and options
Under the Designs Act, 2000, “design” does NOT include
- property mark
- shape
- pattern
- ornament
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A - property mark
Section 2(d) of the Designs Act, 2000 defines design as the features of shape, configuration, pattern, ornament or composition of lines or colours applied to an article, but expressly excludes any trade mark and any property mark. A property mark, a mark showing that movable property belongs to a particular person, is now defined in section 345(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (formerly section 479 IPC). Shape, pattern and ornament are all within the definition.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUSAT CAT Integrated IPR Ph.D.
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in Designs Act, 2000
- In proceedings before the Controller under the Designs Act, 2000, the parties are required to adduce evidence. Under Section 37, subject to the rules made under…
- In a suit for piracy of a registered design under Section 22(2), the defendant contends that the design was not registrable under the Act. Under Section 22(3) of…
- Under the Designs Act, 2000, before a design is registered, X claims that by virtue of a written assignment executed by the applicant, X would, if the design were…
- X, having received a design in confidence from its proprietor, publishes it in breach of good faith before registration. The design is subsequently registered.…
- Which of the following statements is correct under Section 35 of the Designs Act, 2000?