Site navigation

Under Section 115(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (prior to the decriminalisation of Section 107 by the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023), for a court to take cognizance of an offence…

Question and options

Under Section 115(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (prior to the decriminalisation of Section 107 by the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023), for a court to take cognizance of an offence falling under Section 107(1), a complaint in writing had to be made by
  1. affected party
  2. any general public
  3. interested party
  4. registrar of trademarks

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: D - registrar of trademarks
Under Section 115(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, prior to the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 (in force from 1 August 2024), cognizance by a court of an offence under Section 107 (falsely representing a trade mark as registered) could be taken only on a complaint in writing made by the Registrar of Trade Marks or an officer authorised by him in writing. Since August 2024, Section 107(2) has been decriminalised into a civil monetary penalty adjudicated by an adjudicating officer under Section 112A, before whom any person may file a complaint in Form-I under Rule 3 of the Trade Marks (Holding Inquiry and Appeal) Rules, 2024.

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

More solved explanations in Trade Marks Act, 1999