Site navigation

Match the Supreme Court cases in List I with the marks in dispute in List II. List I: (a) Amritdhara…

Amritdhara concerned 'Lakshmandhara' against the registered 'Amritdhara'; Hoffmann-La Roche sought removal of DROPOVIT as similar to PROTOVIT; Midas Hygiene concerned LAXMAN…

Choose your answer

Match the Supreme Court cases in List I with the marks in dispute in List II.
List I:
(a) Amritdhara Pharmacy v Satya Deo Gupta
(b) F. Hoffmann-La Roche v Geoffrey Manners
(c) Midas Hygiene Industries v Sudhir Bhatia
(d) Nandhini Deluxe v Karnataka Co-operative Milk Producers Federation
List II:
(i) PROTOVIT and DROPOVIT
(ii) Amritdhara and Lakshmandhara
(iii) NANDHINI and NANDINI
(iv) LAXMAN REKHA

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer C

Amritdhara concerned 'Lakshmandhara' against the registered 'Amritdhara'; Hoffmann-La Roche sought removal of DROPOVIT as similar to PROTOVIT; Midas Hygiene concerned LAXMAN REKHA; and Nandhini Deluxe concerned NANDHINI against NANDINI. So the correct code is "(a)-(ii), (b)-(i), (c)-(iv), (d)-(iii)". Laxman Rekha is easily mixed up with Lakshmandhara, but they are different cases.

Practice for these exams

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic