As per section 2(1)(m) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, the definition of ‘mark’ does NOT include
Question and options
As per section 2(1)(m) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, the definition of ‘mark’ does NOT include
- A device
- Single colour
- Heading
- Shape of goods
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: B - Single colour
Section 2(1)(m) defines mark to include a device, brand, heading, label, ticket, name, signature, word, letter, numeral, shape of goods, packaging or combination of colours. A single colour is not expressly included, only a combination of colours.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUSAT CAT Integrated IPR Ph.D.
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
Trade Marks Agent
Subject revision
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in Trade Marks Act, 1999
- In Corn Products Refining Co v Shangrila Food Products Ltd (1959), the respondent argued that many marks on the register used 'GLUCO' or 'VITA', so these parts…
- In case, the use of the trade mark is claimed prior to the date of application, the applicant is required to file
- The regulations of a certification trade mark allow appeals to the Registrar against a proprietor's refusal to certify goods. Kamla Spices appeals to the Registrar…
- According to section 26, where a trade mark has been removed from the Register for failure to pay the fee for renewal, it shall nevertheless, for the purpose of…
- Which applicant is prohibited by section 70 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 from registering a certification trade mark? Assume all applicants are competent to…