A WTO Member's trademark law refuses registration of a sound mark solely because it is not visually…
Article 15.1 defines signs capable of constituting a trademark broadly, but expressly adds that "Members may require, as a condition of registration, that signs be visually…
Choose your answer
A WTO Member's trademark law refuses registration of a sound mark solely because it is not visually perceptible. Is this consistent with Article 15.1 of the TRIPS Agreement?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer D
Article 15.1 defines signs capable of constituting a trademark broadly, but expressly adds that "Members may require, as a condition of registration, that signs be visually perceptible". A Member may therefore refuse to register sound or smell marks. Capability to distinguish is a necessary condition for registrability under TRIPS, not a guarantee of registration of every sign.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision