A trademark registered in breach of section 9(1) of the Trade Marks Act can be further validated by proving
Question and options
A trademark registered in breach of section 9(1) of the Trade Marks Act can be further validated by proving
- acquired distinctiveness
- inherent distinctiveness
- declared distinctiveness
- honest concurrent use
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A - acquired distinctiveness
Under section 32 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, a mark registered in breach of section 9(1) shall not be declared invalid if, through the use made of it after registration and before any proceedings challenging it, it has acquired a distinctive character for the goods or services for which it is registered. Such a mark lacked distinctiveness of its own when registered, “declared distinctiveness” is not a ground known to the Act, and honest concurrent use under section 12 answers conflicts with earlier marks, not a section 9(1) defect.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUSAT CAT Integrated IPR Ph.D.
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
Trade Marks Agent
Subject revision
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in Trade Marks Act, 1999
- In Nandhini Deluxe v Karnataka Co-operative Milk Producers Federation (Supreme Court, 2018), the Federation used NANDINI for milk and milk products, while the…
- The Controller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, who shall be the Registrar of Trade Marks for the purposes of Trade Marks Act, 1999, is appointed under…
- 'Trade description' DOES NOT mean any description, statement or other indication, direct or indirect:
- Which listed subject is expressly governed by section 25 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999?
- Under which of the following provision of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, a reference may be made by the Registrar to the High Court?