Under rule 7 of the Gujarat High Court Rules, 1993, which of the following shall the Registrar, the…

The rule covers appeal memorandums, applications and cross-objections when the stated filing conditions are satisfied. The combined alternative therefore includes every listed category that the specified officers must admit.

Why not "All memorandums of appeals"? Appeal memorandums fall within the rule, but the rule is not confined to them. It also names applications and cross-objections subject to the same filing requirements. Selecting this category alone would leave out other documents expressly included in the officers’ admission function.

Why not "Applications or cross-objections"? Applications and cross-objections are included, but appeal memorandums are included as well. The question supplies the procedural conditions applicable to the complete set of filings. The combined alternative is more accurate because it preserves all the categories named in the rule rather than only some.

Why not "None of the following alternatives: All memorandums of appeals; Applications or cross-objections; Both all memorandums of appeals and applications or cross-objections."? The rule expressly identifies the categories supplied in the other alternatives. It would therefore be incorrect to reject all of them when the listed requirements are met. The combined description captures both appeal memorandums and applications or cross-objections, which the rule treats together.