Match the rent-law cases in List I with the subjects in List II (Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control…
The cases match in List I order: Roop Chand v Gopi Chand Thalia with subletting, Bant Singh v Ram Chand with change of user, Om Parkash v Sarla Kumari with arrears of rent,…
Choose your answer
Match the rent-law cases in List I with the subjects in List II (Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act context). The codes in the answer options follow List I order A–D.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| A. Roop Chand v Gopi Chand Thalia | (i) Subletting |
| B. Bant Singh v Ram Chand | (ii) Change of user |
| C. Om Parkash v Sarla Kumari | (iii) Arrears of rent |
| D. Som Nath Sharma v Prem Lata | (iv) Bona fide need |
Answer and explanation
Correct answer A
The cases match in List I order: Roop Chand v Gopi Chand Thalia with subletting, Bant Singh v Ram Chand with change of user, Om Parkash v Sarla Kumari with arrears of rent, and Som Nath Sharma v Prem Lata with bona fide need, each a ground of eviction under section 14 of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987. The code is therefore "i ii iii iv".
Practice for these exams
-
Himachal Pradesh Judicial Services