In 2016, the Himachal Pradesh High Court declared which section of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, as amended by H.P. Act No. 8 of 2012, unconstitutional in its entirety?
Question and options
In 2016, the Himachal Pradesh High Court declared which section of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, as amended by H.P. Act No. 8 of 2012, unconstitutional in its entirety?
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4
Section 14
Answer and explanation
In Chaman Lal Bali v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2016), the High Court struck down section 4, which laid down the procedure for determining standard rent, and held sections 5 to 8 and 30(2) invalid only so far as they depend on standard rent fixed under section 4, other than agreed rent. Section 14 survived except for the first proviso to clause (c) of sub-section (3), on the modalities of a tenant’s re-entry; the right of re-entry itself was upheld. Sections 2 and 3 were not declared unconstitutional.
Practice for these exams
-
Himachal Pradesh Judicial Services
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in STL.HP Himachal Pradesh
- Read both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and give the correct answer by using the codes given below it: Assertion (A): "Excise Revenue" means any revenue derived…
- On which date HP Urban Rent Control Act came into force?
- Under which section of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 is the power to summon and enforce attendance of witnesses provided?
- Section 17 of H.P.U.R.C. Act relates to:
- Match each rule under the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 with its provision. Rules a. Bona fide requirement b. Ceasing to occupy the premises c.…