Which of the following Cases-Concepts pair relating to Transfer of property Act is incorrect?
Question and options
Which of the following Cases-Concepts pair relating to Transfer of property Act is incorrect?
- Cooper v. Cooper - Doctrine of election explained
- Edwards v. Hammond - Fulfillment of condition precedent in transfer of property
- Whitby v. Mitchell - Rule against perpetuity
- Tulk v. Moxhay - Inheritance by minor
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: D - Tulk v. Moxhay - Inheritance by minor
Cooper v Cooper (doctrine of election), Edwards v Hammond (condition precedent) and Whitby v Mitchell (rule against perpetuity / double possibilities) are correctly paired. Tulk v Moxhay concerns restrictive covenants running with land, not inheritance by a minor, so the pair 'Tulk v. Moxhay - Inheritance by minor' is incorrect.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUSAT CAT LLM
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in General principles of transfer
- Partition of immovable property is:
- Rule against perpetuity is found in which section of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882?
- Point out the correct answer. Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882
- What does Transfer of Property Act section 6 concern?
- A conveys ownership of land to B on condition that B may dispose of it only by sale to C, even if C declines to buy. What is the effect of the condition under…