Which doctrine did the English Court of Appeal in Chancery explain in Bellamy v Sabine (1857)?
Bellamy v Sabine explains lis pendens, under which the result of pending litigation can bind a person deriving title from a party during the litigation. In India, section 52…
Choose your answer
Which doctrine did the English Court of Appeal in Chancery explain in Bellamy v Sabine (1857)?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer A
Bellamy v Sabine explains lis pendens, under which the result of pending litigation can bind a person deriving title from a party during the litigation.
In India, section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 governs dealings with immovable property during qualifying litigation.
Option feedback
Option A
The judgment explains why a transferee who derives title during pending litigation may be bound by its result.
Option B
Part performance concerns a distinct protection for certain transferees in possession under section 53A in India.
Option C
Election concerns choosing between inconsistent rights in the circumstances of section 35 in India.
Option D
The rule against perpetuity limits remoteness of vesting, a different topic reflected in section 14 in India.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
Odisha Judicial Services
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision