Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer. "Rivers should link, not divide us," said the Indian Prime Minister expressing concern over interstate disputes and urged state governments to…
Question and options
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer.
"Rivers should link, not divide us," said the Indian Prime Minister expressing concern over interstate disputes and urged state governments to show "understanding and consideration, statesmanship and an appreciation of the other point of view,"
Water conflicts in India now reach every level; divide every segment of our society, political parties, states, regions and sub-regions within states, districts, castes and groups and individual farmers. Water conflicts within and between many developing countries are also taking a serious turn. Fortunately, the "water wars", forecast by so many, have not yet materialized. War has taken place, but over oil, not water. Water is radically altering and affecting political boundaries all over the world. Between as well as within countries. In India, water conflicts are likely to worsen before they begin to be resolved. Till then they pose a significant threat to economic growth, security and health of the eco-system and the victims are likely to be the poorest of the poor as well as the very sources of water-rivers, wetlands and aquifers
Conflicts might sound bad or negative, but they are logical developments in the absence of proper democratic, legal and administrative mechanisms to handle issues at the root of water conflicts. Part of the problem stems from the specific nature of water, namely that water is divisible and amenable to sharing; one unit of water used by one is a unit denied to others; it has multiple uses and users and involves resultant trade-offs. Excludability is an inherent problem and very often exclusion costs involved are very high: it involves the issue of graded scales and boundaries and need for evolving a corresponding understanding around them. Finally, the way water is planned, used and managed causes externalities, both positive and negative, and many of them are unidirectional and asymmetric.
There is a relatively greater visibility as well as a greater body of experience in evolving policies, frameworks, legal set-ups and administrative mechanisms dealing with immobile natural resources, however, contested the space may be. Reformists as well as revolutionary movements are rooted in issues related to land. Several political and legal interventions addressing the issue of equity and societal justice have been attempted. Most countries have gone through land reforms of one type or another. Issues related to forests have also generated a body of comprehensive literature on forest resources and rights. Though conflicts over them have not necessarily been effectively or adequately resolved, they have received much more serious attention, have been studied in their own right and practical as well as theoretical means of dealing with them have been sought. In contrast, water conflicts have not received the same kind of attention.
"Rivers should link, not divide us," said the Indian Prime Minister expressing concern over interstate disputes and urged state governments to show "understanding and consideration, statesmanship and an appreciation of the other point of view,"
Water conflicts in India now reach every level; divide every segment of our society, political parties, states, regions and sub-regions within states, districts, castes and groups and individual farmers. Water conflicts within and between many developing countries are also taking a serious turn. Fortunately, the "water wars", forecast by so many, have not yet materialized. War has taken place, but over oil, not water. Water is radically altering and affecting political boundaries all over the world. Between as well as within countries. In India, water conflicts are likely to worsen before they begin to be resolved. Till then they pose a significant threat to economic growth, security and health of the eco-system and the victims are likely to be the poorest of the poor as well as the very sources of water-rivers, wetlands and aquifers
Conflicts might sound bad or negative, but they are logical developments in the absence of proper democratic, legal and administrative mechanisms to handle issues at the root of water conflicts. Part of the problem stems from the specific nature of water, namely that water is divisible and amenable to sharing; one unit of water used by one is a unit denied to others; it has multiple uses and users and involves resultant trade-offs. Excludability is an inherent problem and very often exclusion costs involved are very high: it involves the issue of graded scales and boundaries and need for evolving a corresponding understanding around them. Finally, the way water is planned, used and managed causes externalities, both positive and negative, and many of them are unidirectional and asymmetric.
There is a relatively greater visibility as well as a greater body of experience in evolving policies, frameworks, legal set-ups and administrative mechanisms dealing with immobile natural resources, however, contested the space may be. Reformists as well as revolutionary movements are rooted in issues related to land. Several political and legal interventions addressing the issue of equity and societal justice have been attempted. Most countries have gone through land reforms of one type or another. Issues related to forests have also generated a body of comprehensive literature on forest resources and rights. Though conflicts over them have not necessarily been effectively or adequately resolved, they have received much more serious attention, have been studied in their own right and practical as well as theoretical means of dealing with them have been sought. In contrast, water conflicts have not received the same kind of attention.
The author of the passage states “Water conflicts in India now reach every level” means
- Divided our society
- Divided political parties, states, regions and sub regions within states and districts
- Divided castes, groups and individual farmers
- Divided every segment: society, political parties, states, regions, sub-regions, districts, castes, groups and individual farmers
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: D - Divided every segment: society, political parties, states, regions, sub-regions, districts, castes, groups and individual farmers
The passage says conflicts divide every segment of society: political parties, states, regions, sub-regions, districts, castes, groups and individual farmers. Each of the other options names only part of this, so the option covering every segment is correct.
Practice for these exams
-
CUSAT Three-Year LL.B.
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in English Language
- Read the passage and answer the question. [1]In the early part of the 3rd millennium, civilisation, in the sense of an organized system of government over a…
- Read the following passage carefully and answer the question that follows. Renowned farm scientist M.S. Swaminathan has pointed out that there is no field where…
- Directions: Rearrange the following four sentences 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the proper sequence to form a meaningful paragraph and then mark the correct sequence as your…
- Read the passage and answer the question. The questions based on this passage are to be answered on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. For some…
- Directions: The first and the last parts of the sentence/paragraph are numbered. The rest of the sentence/paragraph is split into parts and named P, Q, R and so…