Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer. "Rivers should link, not divide us," said the Indian Prime Minister expressing concern over interstate disputes and urged state governments to…
Question and options
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer.
"Rivers should link, not divide us," said the Indian Prime Minister expressing concern over interstate disputes and urged state governments to show "understanding and consideration, statesmanship and an appreciation of the other point of view,"
Water conflicts in India now reach every level; divide every segment of our society, political parties, states, regions and sub-regions within states, districts, castes and groups and individual farmers. Water conflicts within and between many developing countries are also taking a serious turn. Fortunately, the "water wars", forecast by so many, have not yet materialized. War has taken place, but over oil, not water. Water is radically altering and affecting political boundaries all over the world. Between as well as within countries. In India, water conflicts are likely to worsen before they begin to be resolved. Till then they pose a significant threat to economic growth, security and health of the eco-system and the victims are likely to be the poorest of the poor as well as the very sources of water-rivers, wetlands and aquifers
Conflicts might sound bad or negative, but they are logical developments in the absence of proper democratic, legal and administrative mechanisms to handle issues at the root of water conflicts. Part of the problem stems from the specific nature of water, namely that water is divisible and amenable to sharing; one unit of water used by one is a unit denied to others; it has multiple uses and users and involves resultant trade-offs. Excludability is an inherent problem and very often exclusion costs involved are very high: it involves the issue of graded scales and boundaries and need for evolving a corresponding understanding around them. Finally, the way water is planned, used and managed causes externalities, both positive and negative, and many of them are unidirectional and asymmetric.
There is a relatively greater visibility as well as a greater body of experience in evolving policies, frameworks, legal set-ups and administrative mechanisms dealing with immobile natural resources, however, contested the space may be. Reformists as well as revolutionary movements are rooted in issues related to land. Several political and legal interventions addressing the issue of equity and societal justice have been attempted. Most countries have gone through land reforms of one type or another. Issues related to forests have also generated a body of comprehensive literature on forest resources and rights. Though conflicts over them have not necessarily been effectively or adequately resolved, they have received much more serious attention, have been studied in their own right and practical as well as theoretical means of dealing with them have been sought. In contrast, water conflicts have not received the same kind of attention.
"Rivers should link, not divide us," said the Indian Prime Minister expressing concern over interstate disputes and urged state governments to show "understanding and consideration, statesmanship and an appreciation of the other point of view,"
Water conflicts in India now reach every level; divide every segment of our society, political parties, states, regions and sub-regions within states, districts, castes and groups and individual farmers. Water conflicts within and between many developing countries are also taking a serious turn. Fortunately, the "water wars", forecast by so many, have not yet materialized. War has taken place, but over oil, not water. Water is radically altering and affecting political boundaries all over the world. Between as well as within countries. In India, water conflicts are likely to worsen before they begin to be resolved. Till then they pose a significant threat to economic growth, security and health of the eco-system and the victims are likely to be the poorest of the poor as well as the very sources of water-rivers, wetlands and aquifers
Conflicts might sound bad or negative, but they are logical developments in the absence of proper democratic, legal and administrative mechanisms to handle issues at the root of water conflicts. Part of the problem stems from the specific nature of water, namely that water is divisible and amenable to sharing; one unit of water used by one is a unit denied to others; it has multiple uses and users and involves resultant trade-offs. Excludability is an inherent problem and very often exclusion costs involved are very high: it involves the issue of graded scales and boundaries and need for evolving a corresponding understanding around them. Finally, the way water is planned, used and managed causes externalities, both positive and negative, and many of them are unidirectional and asymmetric.
There is a relatively greater visibility as well as a greater body of experience in evolving policies, frameworks, legal set-ups and administrative mechanisms dealing with immobile natural resources, however, contested the space may be. Reformists as well as revolutionary movements are rooted in issues related to land. Several political and legal interventions addressing the issue of equity and societal justice have been attempted. Most countries have gone through land reforms of one type or another. Issues related to forests have also generated a body of comprehensive literature on forest resources and rights. Though conflicts over them have not necessarily been effectively or adequately resolved, they have received much more serious attention, have been studied in their own right and practical as well as theoretical means of dealing with them have been sought. In contrast, water conflicts have not received the same kind of attention.
Which of the following can be inferred about water conflicts?
- Water management techniques like dams, linking rivers, etc have negative and positive consequences
- There is no real solution to water conflicts
- Despite receiving much attention water conflicts remain unresolved
- Water conflicts mainly affect the richer sections of society
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A - Water management techniques like dams, linking rivers, etc have negative and positive consequences
The passage says the way water is planned, used and managed causes externalities, both positive and negative, so management measures such as dams and river linking have both kinds of consequences. The claims that there is no real solution and that conflicts remain unresolved despite much attention contradict the passage (water conflicts have received too little attention), and the claim about richer sections is wrong because the poorest of the poor are the likely victims.
Practice for these exams
-
CUSAT Three-Year LL.B.
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in English Language
- Read the passage and answer the question. IOT has had an impact across all fields, be it industries, government, small or large businesses and even for Personal…
- Read the passage and answer the question that follows. All of us play but we are not athletes. We are homo ludens (Latin for play) and our playfulness is…
- Directions: Choose antonym of the word from among the choices given. VIOLENT
- Read the passage and answer the question. There is a fairly universal sentiment that the use of nuclear weapons is clearly contrary to morality and that its…
- Directions: Read the paragraph and answer the question. Understanding where you are in the world is a basic survival skill, which is why we, like most species come…