Site navigation

Directions: The question consists of a statement, followed by three or four arguments numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ argument(s) and which…

Question and options

Directions: The question consists of a statement, followed by three or four arguments numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ argument(s) and which is/are ‘weak’ argument(s) and accordingly choose your answer from the given alternatives.

Statement: Should all the management institutes in the country be brought under government control?
Arguments:
I. No. The government does not have adequate resources to run such institutes effectively.
II. No. Government control is never good for anything.
III. Yes. This will enable to have standardized education for all the students.
IV. Yes. Only then the quality of education would be improved.
  1. None is strong
  2. Only I, II and III are strong
  3. Only I and III are strong
  4. All are strong

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: C - Only I and III are strong
I is strong: the government lacking resources to run the institutes is a real practical objection. III is strong: government control would give standardised education. II is a sweeping generalisation and IV uses the extreme 'only then', so both are weak. Answer: only I and III.

Practice for these exams

  • CUSAT CAT Five-Year LL.B.

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

More solved explanations in Reasoning