Site navigation

You are a marketing manager evaluating two advertising campaigns. Campaign X has a higher cost but a proven track record of success, while Campaign Y is more affordable but is untested. What…

Question and options

You are a marketing manager evaluating two advertising campaigns. Campaign X has a higher cost but a proven track record of success, while Campaign Y is more affordable but is untested. What decision-making criterion would be most relevant in this scenario?
  1. Emotional appeal
  2. Cost-benefit analysis
  3. Market demand analysis
  4. Random selection

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: B - Cost-benefit analysis
Choosing between a costly proven campaign and a cheap untested one means weighing cost against expected benefit and risk, which is cost-benefit analysis. Emotional appeal and random selection are not rational criteria, and market demand is not what separates the two campaigns.

Practice for these exams

  • CUSAT CAT M.Sc. Bioethics

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

More solved explanations in Finance & management basics