Statement: Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises? Arguments: I. No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do? II. Yes. In a…
Question and options
Statement: Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises?
Arguments: I. No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do?
II. Yes. In a competitive world the rule is 'survival of the fittest'.
Arguments: I. No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do?
II. Yes. In a competitive world the rule is 'survival of the fittest'.
- Only argument I is strong
- Only argument II is strong
- Either I or II is strong
- Neither I nor II is strong
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A - Only argument I is strong
Argument I is strong because closing down public sector enterprises directly throws thousands of employees out of jobs and livelihood security; a government should first examine causes of loss and pursue reform or restructuring rather than outright closure. Argument II is weak because invoking 'survival of the fittest' is a vague cliché, not a sound policy justification. Hence, only argument I is strong.
Practice for these exams
-
CUSAT Three-Year LL.B.
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in Verbal & critical reasoning
- Pick out the word that does NOT fit in with the others:
- The barometer is to pressure as the altimeter is to __________
- Which differs?
- Which alternative applies to the following Statement and Assumption? Statement: Go by Aeroplane to reach Delhi from Chennai quickly. Assumptions: I. Chennai and…
- Assume both statements are true for this question. All planets are moons. All moons are stars. Which conclusion or conclusions must follow? I. All moons are…