Some philosophers argue that what does not exist is not knowledge. Which of the following alternatives is implied by this claim?
Question and options
Some philosophers argue that what does not exist is not knowledge. Which of the following alternatives is implied by this claim?
- Knowledge presupposes object of knowledge
- What exists must be knowable
- No knowledge is possible
- Whatever exists is known
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A - Knowledge presupposes object of knowledge
If what does not exist cannot be known (is not knowledge), then knowledge requires an existing object; i.e. knowledge presupposes an object of knowledge. 'What exists must be knowable' and 'Whatever exists is known' are illicit conversions; 'No knowledge is possible' does not follow.
Practice for these exams
-
CUSAT CAT Five-Year LL.B.
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in Verbal & critical reasoning
- What will come in place of question mark? Clock : Time : : Thermometer : ?
- A statement is followed by two conclusions, A and B. Taking the statement to be true, decide which of the conclusions logically follows from it. Statement:…
- A statement is followed by two assumptions, I and II. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. Consider the statement and decide which of the…
- Vijay claimed that the large dent in the fender of the company-owned vehicle he had borrowed was caused by the careless act of another motorist, who backed into…
- Directions: There are four choices. Three of them are alike and one is different. Find the odd one out. Which of the given words is the odd one out?