Anger can be a useful emotion. It can play a key role in building a strong individual psyche, as also a just society. But the algohacking of our brains to keep them in a state of incessant anger?…
Question and options
Anger can be a useful emotion. It can play a key role in building a strong individual psyche, as also a just society. But the algohacking of our brains to keep them in a state of incessant anger? That's pure poison. Some companies and individuals draw colossal profits from it, but at terrible cost to general well-being. That rage bait has been declared Oxford English Dictionary's word of 2025 is indicative of the spread of this poison. In 2024, it was brain rot that came on top. Both speak of the same diseased online ecosystem. All of this is bad enough for adults, but what it's doing to children is a great nightmare.
Specifically, rage bait refers to online content designed to elicit anger or outrage. Once tech platforms figured out how this kind of content spirals user engagement, the algorithms got tweaked to feed us more and more of the same, activating a diabolical incentive structure of hate. Of course, in this swamp, reality is completely distorted. You could take any major event of recent times as an example and the difference between your newspaper's reportage and your online feed would be dramatic. Reading responsible accounts of pollution, a terror attack, an election result etc. would give you food for thought. On social media, you would be targeted with stuff doctored to send you into troll mode.
If you block the accounts that most inflame you, you deprive them of your attention, you refuse to buy the hate they are selling. Blocking even hurts them with the algorithm. David did defeat Goliath. And make no mistake, this is a civilisational battle. We must fight against the atrophy of our attention, its capture by the most terrible types of things that human nature can be drawn to, and to regain our sense and sensibility.
The author is of the opinion that
Specifically, rage bait refers to online content designed to elicit anger or outrage. Once tech platforms figured out how this kind of content spirals user engagement, the algorithms got tweaked to feed us more and more of the same, activating a diabolical incentive structure of hate. Of course, in this swamp, reality is completely distorted. You could take any major event of recent times as an example and the difference between your newspaper's reportage and your online feed would be dramatic. Reading responsible accounts of pollution, a terror attack, an election result etc. would give you food for thought. On social media, you would be targeted with stuff doctored to send you into troll mode.
If you block the accounts that most inflame you, you deprive them of your attention, you refuse to buy the hate they are selling. Blocking even hurts them with the algorithm. David did defeat Goliath. And make no mistake, this is a civilisational battle. We must fight against the atrophy of our attention, its capture by the most terrible types of things that human nature can be drawn to, and to regain our sense and sensibility.
The author is of the opinion that
- the response of users does not vary according to the media consumed.
- the reaction of users cannot be controlled by media.
- social media reports more widely and responsibly.
- reading responsible media reports promotes thoughtfulness.
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: D - reading responsible media reports promotes thoughtfulness.
The author says reading responsible accounts of events gives you food for thought, while social media feeds push you into troll mode. Responsible reporting therefore promotes thoughtfulness, and response clearly varies with the medium consumed.
Practice for these exams
-
IPMAT Indore
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
Related question papers
Related exam syllabi
More solved explanations in Reading comprehension
- Directions: Read the passage to answer the question that follows. Passage II The report that the Union Cabinet considered the draft of a bill to prohibit the…
- Read the passage and answer the question below : Have you ever thought of the most important activity at your workplace ? The answer is communication. It is an…
- Read the passage and answer the question. Fungi form an isolated group within the plant kingdom and indeed are regarded by many as forming a separate kingdom of…
- Read the following passage and answer : Men have fought wars but mankind survived. This earth has survived the two world wars, but it may not be able to survive a…
- Read the passage and answer using what it says. Daily consumption of a certain form of curcumin improved memory and mood in people with mild, age-related memory…