Site navigation

Match List I with List II and select the correct answer:List I (Case)List II (General principle referred) (a) Chorzow Factory (1) Estoppel (b) Diversion of water from the Meuse (2) Res judicata (c)…

Question and options

Match List I with List II and select the correct answer:
List I (Case)List II (General principle referred)
(a) Chorzow Factory(1) Estoppel
(b) Diversion of water from the Meuse(2) Res judicata
(c) Mosul Boundary Case(3) No one can be a judge in his own cause
(d) German interests in Upper Silesia(4) Litispendence
  1. (a) - (1), (b) - (2), (c) - (4), (d) - (3)
  2. (a) - (2), (b) - (1), (c) - (3), (d) - (4)
  3. (a) - (4), (b) - (1), (c) - (3), (d) - (2)
  4. (a) - (3), (b) - (2), (c) - (4), (d) - (1)

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: B - (a) - (2), (b) - (1), (c) - (3), (d) - (4)
General principles applied by the PCIJ: Chorzow Factory (Interpretation, judgment 11) on res judicata (2). Diversion of Water from the Meuse on estoppel/equity (1). Mosul Boundary (Art 3 Treaty of Lausanne) on no one being judge in his own cause (3). German Interests in Upper Silesia on litispendence (4).

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

More solved explanations in Nature, basis & sources; relationship with municipal law