Arrange the following cases in their chronological order: (A) Legal consequences of the continued…
In chronological order the decisions run: the Voting Procedure advisory opinion on South-West Africa (1955), the Namibia advisory opinion (1971), Fisheries Jurisdiction…
Choose your answer
Arrange the following cases in their chronological order:
(A) Legal consequences of the continued presence of South Africa in Namibia (South-West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution (Advisory Opinion)
(B) Texaco Overseas Petroleum Co. v. Govt. of the Libyan Arab Republic
(C) Fisheries Jurisdiction (United Kingdom v. Iceland)
(D) Western Sahara Case (Advisory Opinion)
(E) Voting Procedure on Questions Relating to Reports and Petitions Concerning the Territory of South-West Africa (Advisory Opinion)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer B
In chronological order the decisions run: the Voting Procedure advisory opinion on South-West Africa (1955), the Namibia advisory opinion (1971), Fisheries Jurisdiction (United Kingdom v. Iceland) (1974), the Western Sahara advisory opinion (1975) and the Texaco v. Libya award (1977). Hence the order is "(E), (A), (C), (D), (B)".
Practice for these exams
-
UGC NET Law
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision