The Supreme Court of India in Harish Chandra Tiwari v. Baiju, (2002), while considering the appropriate…
Harish Chandra Tiwari v. Baiju held that "Misappropriation of a client's money constitutes one of the gravest forms of professional misconduct and ordinarily warrants…
Choose your answer
The Supreme Court of India in Harish Chandra Tiwari v. Baiju, (2002), while considering the appropriate punishment for misappropriation of a client’s money by an advocate, held that :
Answer and explanation
Correct answer D
Harish Chandra Tiwari v. Baiju held that "Misappropriation of a client's money constitutes one of the gravest forms of professional misconduct and ordinarily warrants removal of the advocate's name from the State roll.", because it destroys the fiduciary trust underlying the relationship. A fixed monetary penalty, a mere reprimand or a standard five-year suspension is not the rule stated.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision