Site navigation

The Supreme Court of India in Harish Chandra Tiwari v. Baiju, (2002), while considering the appropriate…

Harish Chandra Tiwari v. Baiju held that "Misappropriation of a client's money constitutes one of the gravest forms of professional misconduct and ordinarily warrants…

Choose your answer

The Supreme Court of India in Harish Chandra Tiwari v. Baiju, (2002), while considering the appropriate punishment for misappropriation of a client’s money by an advocate, held that :

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer D

Harish Chandra Tiwari v. Baiju held that "Misappropriation of a client's money constitutes one of the gravest forms of professional misconduct and ordinarily warrants removal of the advocate's name from the State roll.", because it destroys the fiduciary trust underlying the relationship. A fixed monetary penalty, a mere reprimand or a standard five-year suspension is not the rule stated.

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic