Match the following: List I (a) Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (b) Kesavananda Bharati v. State of…
Indra Sawhney v Union of India (1992) is the Mandal Commission case on reservations, Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala (1973) laid down the doctrine of basic structure,…
Choose your answer
Match the following:
| List I | |
|---|---|
| (a) | Indra Sawhney v. Union of India |
| (b) | Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala |
| (c) | Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug v. Union of India |
| (d) | Selvi v. State of Karnataka |
| List II | |
|---|---|
| (i) | Doctrine of legitimate expectation |
| (ii) | Validity of narco-analysis |
| (iii) | Doctrine of basic structure |
| (iv) | Mandal Commission case |
| (v) | Passive euthanasia |
Answer and explanation
Correct answer A
Indra Sawhney v Union of India (1992) is the Mandal Commission case on reservations, Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala (1973) laid down the doctrine of basic structure, Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug v Union of India (2011) allowed passive euthanasia under safeguards, and Selvi v State of Karnataka (2010) decided the validity of narco-analysis. The correct match is "(a)-(iv), (b)-(iii), (c)-(v), (d)-(ii)"; item (i), the doctrine of legitimate expectation, matches none of the following cases.
Practice for these exams
-
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
Haryana Judicial Services
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision