Match List-I (name of case) with List-II (capacity to sue) and give the correct answer by using the…
State of Saurashtra v Memon Haji Ismail turns on municipal law not applying, Delhi Transport Corporation v Kumari Lalita on a suit by a minor, Brown v Lewis on an…
Choose your answer
Match List-I (name of case) with List-II (capacity to sue) and give the correct answer by using the code given below :
| List - I | List-II |
|---|---|
| (a) State of Saurashtra Vs Memon Haji Ismail | (i) No right to Sue as an un-incorporated association |
| (b) Delhi Transport Corporation Vs Kumari Lalita | (ii) Municipal law does not apply |
| (c) Brown Vs Lewis | (iii) Suit against corporation |
| (d) Campbell Vs Paddington | (iv) Suit by minor |
Choose the answer corresponding to the order : (a) (b) (c) (d)
Answer and explanation
Correct answer A
State of Saurashtra v Memon Haji Ismail turns on municipal law not applying, Delhi Transport Corporation v Kumari Lalita on a suit by a minor, Brown v Lewis on an unincorporated association having no right to sue, and Campbell v Paddington on a suit against a corporation, giving "(ii) (iv) (i) (iii)".
Practice for these exams
-
UGC NET Law
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision