In Zile Singh v. State of Haryana (2004), the Supreme Court restated a cardinal principle of…
Zile Singh (2004) restated that "every statute is prima facie prospective" unless it is expressly or by necessary implication made retrospective. This is the presumption…
Choose your answer
In Zile Singh v. State of Haryana (2004), the Supreme Court restated a cardinal principle of construction about the temporal operation of statutes. Which is it?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer B
Zile Singh (2004) restated that "every statute is prima facie prospective" unless it is expressly or by necessary implication made retrospective. This is the presumption against retrospectivity. The same judgment added that the presumption does not apply to declaratory statutes.
Practice for these exams
-
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision