Site navigation

In Zile Singh v. State of Haryana (2004), the Supreme Court restated a cardinal principle of…

Zile Singh (2004) restated that "every statute is prima facie prospective" unless it is expressly or by necessary implication made retrospective. This is the presumption…

Choose your answer

In Zile Singh v. State of Haryana (2004), the Supreme Court restated a cardinal principle of construction about the temporal operation of statutes. Which is it?

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer B

Zile Singh (2004) restated that "every statute is prima facie prospective" unless it is expressly or by necessary implication made retrospective. This is the presumption against retrospectivity. The same judgment added that the presumption does not apply to declaratory statutes.

Practice for these exams

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic