Site navigation

In W.H. King v. Republic of India (1952), the Supreme Court set aside a conviction under the Bombay…

In WH King v Republic of India (1952), the Court held that "the words of the section must be strictly construed in favour of the subject" and set aside the conviction. A…

Choose your answer

In W.H. King v. Republic of India (1952), the Supreme Court set aside a conviction under the Bombay rent-control law. What did it say about the words of the penal section?

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer A

In WH King v Republic of India (1952), the Court held that "the words of the section must be strictly construed in favour of the subject" and set aside the conviction. A penal provision is not stretched to cover cases not clearly within it. A beneficial construction in favour of tenants is the approach for welfare provisions, not for the penal sections that punish an accused.

Practice for these exams

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic