In light of the judgment in Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (dated 12 May 2023), which of…
The 12 May 2023 Indira Jaising judgment retained professional experience and academic contributions, including teaching, as designation considerations. It also called for…
Choose your answer
In light of the judgment in Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (dated 12 May 2023), which of these is not a factor to be counted while designating a lawyer as a Senior Advocate by the Supreme Court?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer C
The 12 May 2023 Indira Jaising judgment retained professional experience and academic contributions, including teaching, as designation considerations. It also called for due regard to diversity, particularly gender and first-generation lawyers. The assessment concerns the advocate's substantive contribution and ability; a count of routine mentionings before the Chief Justice is not a prescribed factor.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision