In Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), Sikri CJ disagreed with the view taken in In re…
Sikri CJ held that Berubari was wrong and that "the Preamble is a part of the Constitution, as it was expressly voted to be a part of it". This did not make the Preamble a…
Choose your answer
In Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), Sikri CJ disagreed with the view taken in In re Berubari Union (1960) on the Preamble. He held that:
Answer and explanation
Correct answer D
Sikri CJ held that Berubari was wrong and that "the Preamble is a part of the Constitution, as it was expressly voted to be a part of it". This did not make the Preamble a source of legislative power; the powers of Parliament come from the operative provisions.
Practice for these exams
-
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision