In Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India, the Supreme Court discussed whether an advocate has an…
The Court said Article 145 and section 34 "clearly show that there is no absolute right to an Advocate to appear in a Court". An advocate appears subject to conditions the…
Choose your answer
In Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India, the Supreme Court discussed whether an advocate has an absolute right to appear in court. What did it conclude?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer A
The Court said Article 145 and section 34 "clearly show that there is no absolute right to an Advocate to appear in a Court". An advocate appears subject to conditions the court lays down, and control of proceedings in court will always remain with the court. Practice outside court, by contrast, is subject to conditions laid down by the Bar Council of India.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision