In an appeal decided on 21 November 2008, the Delhi High Court ordered a packaged-water company to…
On 21 November 2008, the Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal in Bureau of Indian Standards v. PepsiCo India Holdings. Paragraph 24 directed PepsiCo to remove the…
Choose your answer
In an appeal decided on 21 November 2008, the Delhi High Court ordered a packaged-water company to remove a snow-capped mountain device from its product label. Which company received that direction?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer A
On 21 November 2008, the Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal in Bureau of Indian Standards v. PepsiCo India Holdings. Paragraph 24 directed PepsiCo to remove the snow-capped mountain device from the Aquafina label within six months. It also directed the company to add ‘as per BIS standards’ after ‘purity guaranteed’.
Option feedback
Option A
PepsiCo India Holdings was the first respondent and received the direction in paragraph 24.
Option B
The first respondent was PepsiCo India Holdings. The direction concerned its Aquafina label.
Option C
The judgment directed PepsiCo India Holdings, the company responsible for the Aquafina label.
Option D
Paragraph 24 directed the first respondent, PepsiCo India Holdings, to remove the device.
Practice for these exams
-
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision