Which of the following judgments does not relate to the welfare of minor being of paramount…
"Revanasiddappa v. Mallikarjun, (2011)." concerns the property rights of children of void and voidable marriages, not custody, whereas "Mauami Moitra Ganguli v. Jayant…
Choose your answer
Which of the following judgments does not relate to the welfare of minor being of paramount consideration?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer B
"Revanasiddappa v. Mallikarjun, (2011)." concerns the property rights of children of void and voidable marriages, not custody, whereas "Mauami Moitra Ganguli v. Jayant Ganguli, (2008).", "Gaurav Nagpal v. Sumedha Nagpal, (2009)." and "Jitender Arora v. Sukriti Arora, (2017)." are custody cases applying the welfare-paramount principle.
Practice for these exams
-
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision