Which decision held in 2010 that the parties to a talaq in the Ahsan form could remarry each other…
In Sabah Adnan Sami Khan, the Bombay High Court distinguished an Ahsan divorce from divorce by three pronouncements and held that halala was unnecessary for these parties.…
Choose your answer
Which decision held in 2010 that the parties to a talaq in the Ahsan form could remarry each other without halala after the divorce became final?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer C
In Sabah Adnan Sami Khan, the Bombay High Court distinguished an Ahsan divorce from divorce by three pronouncements and held that halala was unnecessary for these parties.
Sections 2(c) and 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, make a pronouncement of the defined instantaneous and irrevocable form of talaq void and illegal.
Option feedback
Option A
Shamim Ara concerned proof and effectiveness of the claimed talaq.
Option B
Danial Latifi concerned the legal provision and maintenance due to a divorced Muslim woman.
Option C
The Bombay High Court held that the divorce was in the Ahsan form and that halala was unnecessary before the parties remarried.
Option D
Zohara Khatoon concerned the eligibility of a woman who obtained a decree of divorce to seek maintenance.
Practice for these exams
-
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision