Site navigation

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India has held that Section 9 of the Hindu…

Saroj Rani v. Sudarshan Kumar Chadha upheld Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act against the challenge under Articles 14 and 21. The Court considered restitution of conjugal…

Choose your answer

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India has held that Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is not violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Indian Constitution

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer A

Saroj Rani v. Sudarshan Kumar Chadha upheld Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act against the challenge under Articles 14 and 21. The Court considered restitution of conjugal rights as a means of encouraging reconciliation and emphasized the limited method of enforcing the decree. It did not treat the decree as authorizing physical compulsion or enforced sexual relations.

Practice for these exams

  • IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance

    Subject revision

    See pack details on LawMint.net
  • Gujarat Assistant Professor (Law)

  • CUET PG Law (LL.M.)

    Subject revision

  • Bihar Judicial Services

    Subject revision

  • Uttarakhand Judicial Services

    Subject revision

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic