In Githa Hariharan v. R.B.I. (1999), the Supreme Court interpreted the term 'after him' in Section 6 of…
In Githa Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India, (1999) 2 SCC 228, the Supreme Court harmoniously interpreted the words 'after him' in Section 6(a) of the Hindu Minority and…
Choose your answer
In Githa Hariharan v. R.B.I. (1999), the Supreme Court interpreted the term 'after him' in Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act to mean –
Answer and explanation
Correct answer B
In Githa Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India, (1999) 2 SCC 228, the Supreme Court harmoniously interpreted the words 'after him' in Section 6(a) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 to mean 'in the absence of' the father—whether due to death, apathy, mutual agreement, or physical/mental incapacity—rather than only after the father's death.
Practice for these exams
-
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
RPSC Assistant Professor (Law)
-
RPSC Assistant Professor (College Education)
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision