Which one of the following cases is not related to Section 22 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?
R v Dudley and Stephens concerns the defence of necessity in a case of cannibalism at sea, not the defence of unsoundness of mind under BNS s.22 (formerly s.84 IPC), unlike…
Choose your answer
Which one of the following cases is not related to Section 22 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer B
R v Dudley and Stephens concerns the defence of necessity in a case of cannibalism at sea, not the defence of unsoundness of mind under BNS s.22 (formerly s.84 IPC), unlike Ashiruddin Ahmed v King, Dayabhai Chhaganbhai Thakkar v State of Gujarat, and State of M.P. v Ahmadulla, which all involve the insanity defence.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision