Site navigation

The case of Dudh Nath Pandey v. State of U.P. is related to:

Dudh Nath Pandey v State of UP discusses the plea of alibi. The accused must establish presence elsewhere at the relevant time such that presence at the crime scene was…

Choose your answer

The case of Dudh Nath Pandey v. State of U.P. is related to:

Select one answer
Answer and explanation

Correct answer B

Dudh Nath Pandey v State of UP discusses the plea of alibi. The accused must establish presence elsewhere at the relevant time such that presence at the crime scene was physically impossible. A claimed factory attendance did not suffice where the times and short distance were compatible with attendance at the crime scene. The prosecution must still prove its case; rejecting alibi does not replace that burden.

Current law: The corresponding relevance provision is BSA section 9. Its savings in section 170 preserve the former Evidence Act for specified proceedings already pending when the new Act commenced on 1 July 2024.

Practice for these exams

Related question papers

Related exam syllabi

Related questions in this topic