P, with the intention of committing theft entered the house of Q. Q. on seeing him entering, struck him…
Once P fell unconscious, the danger to Q's property and person had ended, so the further, fatal blow inflicted more harm than was necessary for defence, exceeding the limit…
Choose your answer
P, with the intention of committing theft entered the house of Q. Q. on seeing him entering, struck him with a lathi and P fell down unconscious. Thereafter, Q gave him another blow of lathi at his head which caused his death. On being prosecuted for murder, Q took the plea of private defence. Which of the following argument is valid?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer C
Once P fell unconscious, the danger to Q's property and person had ended, so the further, fatal blow inflicted more harm than was necessary for defence, exceeding the limit set by BNS s.37(2), and Q's plea of private defence therefore fails.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision