Match these historical decisions with the provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 considered in them.…
Joseph Shine concerned the adultery provision in section 497, while Naz Foundation concerned section 377. Preeti Gupta concerned cruelty under section 498A, and Subash Babu…
Choose your answer
Match these historical decisions with the provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 considered in them.
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| a. Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018) | 1. Section 498A |
| b. Naz Foundation v. NCT, Delhi (2009) | 2. Section 497 |
| c. Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand (2010) | 3. Section 494 |
| d. Subash Babu v. State of A.P. (2011) | 4. Section 377 |
Answer and explanation
Correct answer D
Joseph Shine concerned the adultery provision in section 497, while Naz Foundation concerned section 377. Preeti Gupta concerned cruelty under section 498A, and Subash Babu concerned bigamy under section 494, giving a-2, b-4, c-1, d-3.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
UGC NET Law
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
KSET Law
-
CLAT PG
Subject revision for a passage-based exam
-
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision