Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh (12 November 2013) addressed FIR registration and limited…
Section 173(3) allows a preliminary enquiry for a cognizable offence "punishable for three years or more but less than seven years", with "the prior permission from an…
Choose your answer
Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh (12 November 2013) addressed FIR registration and limited preliminary inquiry under the CrPC. Which statement correctly identifies the punishment range and permission requirement for the distinct preliminary-inquiry route expressly provided by BNSS section 173(3)?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer C
Section 173(3) allows a preliminary enquiry for a cognizable offence "punishable for three years or more but less than seven years", with "the prior permission from an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police", to be completed within fourteen days. Neither the station officer's nor a Magistrate's permission suffices. Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh (2013) had required FIR registration where a cognizable offence is disclosed and allowed only a limited preliminary inquiry in some categories.
Practice for these exams
-
All India Bar Examination (AIBE)
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
IIT Kharagpur LL.M. Entrance
Subject revision
See pack details on LawMint.net -
CUET PG Law (LL.M.)
Subject revision
-
AILET PG
Subject revision
-
Supreme Court Law Clerk and Research Associate
Subject revision
-
Bihar Judicial Services
Subject revision
-
Uttarakhand Judicial Services
Subject revision